Talk:Battle of Buna–Gona

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Buna–Gona article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4: 30 days

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 10, 2013	Peer review	Reviewed
February 19, 2017	Peer review	Reviewed

Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on January 22, 2019, and January 22, 2024.

Military history: Asian / South Pacific / Japanese / North America / United States / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
	Japanese military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

Australia: Military history Mid‑importance

	Australia portal Battle of Buna–Gona is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Melanesia: Papua New Guinea Mid‑importance

	Oceania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Melanesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Melanesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MelanesiaWikipedia:WikiProject MelanesiaTemplate:WikiProject MelanesiaMelanesia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Papua New Guinea (assessed as Mid-importance).

Japan: Military history Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 14:50, November 20, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the joint Japanese military history task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

Aftermath

I read the following article about the extraordinary large amount of war material left behind in the region. I'm not sure if this might be of interest but here's a link. http://warfarehistorynetwork.com/daily/wwii/a-soldier-remembers-the-aftermath-at-port-moresby-papua-new-guinea/ — btphelps ^{(talk to me) (what I've done)} 20:09, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kudos

Not sure where there’d be a better place to leave this but I have to say, this might very well be the best wikipedia article I’ve ever seen on such a niche topic. Everyone who worked on it is deserving of my thanks. I am very appreciative and I mean that as I’ve encountered a LOT of wiki articles of wildly varying quality. Thanks again for the work that went into this. 2601:87:4400:BEC0:1C6C:BF78:984D:4A54 (talk) 11:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits 22 December 2021 and revert

Btphelps, re this edit and a subsequent edit to Teague as a source in the "Background" section.

The text formerly read: ... they landed on 21 July 1942, to established beachheads at Buna, Gona and Sanananda.

The text now reads: ... they landed between four-thousand and six-thousand troops unopposed on 21 July 1942. They were able to immediately spread out and occupied Buna, Gona and Sanananda.

There is a concern about the reliability of Teague as a source.
The statement now reads that "four-thousand and six-thousand troops" were landed in one day and that the occupation occurred "immediately" This is factually incorrect in that the landings occurred over some ten days.
Teague gives a range of 4,000 - 6,000 landed. Williams (a recent good quality academic source using access to Japanese records not previously available) gives a figure of 4,057 for the troops initially landed. However, I would say that the actual figure is of little consequence, since a lot happened between the initial landings and the subject battle at Buna-Gona. More important is the actual Japanese strength at about the time of the battle some four months latter and after the campaign along the track. That figure was more like 11,000- 12,000 (as reported under the section: "Japanese forces"). At the very least, there is a more precise figure available.

Consequently, I am reverting the edit but please feel free to discuss the matter further per BRD. Cinderella157 (talk) 03:02, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]