Talk:Battle of Bryansk (1941)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Bryansk (1941) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: European / German / Russian & Soviet / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	World War II task force

Panzer Corps Feldherrnhalle

Well, it certainly wasn't there because it had not become this until 1943, and even as the 60th division it was with the AG Nord and spent much of the early war around Leningrad, so which unit took Bryansk?--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 12:10, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Battle of Bryansk (1941). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080610111902/http://velikvoy.narod.ru:80/bitvy/1941/oryol-bryansk.htm to http://velikvoy.narod.ru/bitvy/1941/oryol-bryansk.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://mechcorps.rkka.ru/files/mechcorps/pages/8_meh.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071113122753/http://www.infoshop.org:80/inews/article.php?story=2006122916034560 to http://www.infoshop.org/inews/article.php?story=2006122916034560

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:59, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

General-Leutnant

I removed the title "General-Leutnant" from Andrei Yeremenko because "Leutnant" is German for Lieutenant, and Yeremenko was Soviet. Google Translate says the Russian word for lieutenant is лейтенант which doesn't sound like the German (or English) pronunciation of "Leutnant". Perhaps some other title should be used. The Andrei Yeremenko article says he was acting commander, but "Bryansk Front commander acting commander Yeremenko" sounds wrong, and I don't know if that is what he would be called. But I'm pretty sure it wouldn't be "General-Leutnant". Art LaPella (talk) 05:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kalashnikov…

Reference to Kalashnikov in the introductory segment is good trivia, but uncited and a non-sequitur. 82.17.12.106 (talk) 16:19, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]