Talk:Battle of Belgium order of battle

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: British / European / French / German / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

German 211 Inf. Div.

My sources do not state with authority that this divisions served in Belgium. Can anyone help? Dapi89 (talk) 10:07, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2nd Chasseurs Ardennais

The above is listed twice in the order of battle, first with Belgium forces then with the French. Is this the same unit or two seperate units?--EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 09:36, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was the first, not second that remained with the Belgian Army. Dapi89 (talk) 13:25, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Division vs. Regiment

I'm just wondering if the Belgian "divisions" listed are actually regiments. Units like the 2nd Chasseurs Ard. are certainly regiments, and I believe it unlikely that the others are too... --Brigade Piron (talk) 10:57, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

list vs prose

I removed a tag requesting it be converted to prose on teh grounds that the order of battle is a list of units so a list format is reasonable. On the other hand, adding some prose above each section to give context sounds like a good idea. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RJFJR (talk • contribs) 12:12, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@RJFJR: That's fine, but if you're going to revert someone, please use the undo feature (or Twinkle) so they get notified (I only left this watchlisted accidentally). You also left an extraneous blank line at the top, so I reverted fully. Anyway, this was probably my own fault for not having clicked through to order of battle, not realizing that this is a technical term. I obviously then don't have the expertise to do anything else with this article. If any prose is needed, probably just a bit in the lead would be enough to establish a little more context for clueless types like me, if even that. I'll un-watchlist and leave this to people who know the subject better. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:12, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Broken ping, redoing: RJFJR. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:14, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]