Talk:Battle of Antioch (218)

Battle of Antioch (218) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 6, 2016	Good article nominee	Listed
May 18, 2016	WikiProject A-class review	Not approved
January 12, 2017	WikiProject A-class review	Approved
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on June 8, 2017, June 8, 2018, June 8, 2019, June 8, 2021, and June 8, 2022.
Current status: Good article

Military history: Roman & Byzantine / Classical

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Roman and Byzantine military history task force
	Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)

Additional information:
/
	This article has passed an A-Class review.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wrong Reference

The link has nothing to do with this event. It belongs to the first crusade.213.71.6.130 (talk) 06:10, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Update

did a major overhaul of the entire article, added all the information related to the event that I found. If you make any major changes, or revert the edit, please keep me notified. Provide reasoning if you can, so that I'm not wondering; what happened? Mr rnddude (talk) 10:27, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note

For the review, check the link below. Since my changes are only registered on the other talk page. Thanks Mr rnddude (talk) 02:55, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

from 'The Historia Augusta'?

" One such dispatch detailed a prophecy, perhaps fabricated, from the oracle at Delphi suggesting that Macrinus was destined to kill Caracalla and succeed him as emperor " - Potter and Gibbon are almost certainly referring to a ficticious account from the 'H.A.' - and this should be noted along with a statement that it is almost completely unreliable. 50.111.18.219 (talk) 08:10, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cassius Dio makes mention of a prophecy from a seer in Africa: Antoninus made preparations in his turn; but it did not fall to his lot to carry on the war, for he was murdered in the midst of his soldiers, whom he most honoured and in whom he reposed vast confidence. It seems that a seer in Africa had declared, in such a manner that it became noised abroad, that be Macrinus, the prefect, and his son, Diadumenianus, were destined to hold the imperial power; and later this seer, upon being sent to Rome, had revealed this prophecy to Flavius Maternianus, who at the time commanded the soldiers in the city, and this man had at once written a letter to Antoninus. It's possible that the HA has amended this to reference the oracle at Delphi. I'm not sure what Herodian of Antioch says about the matter and don't have his work at hand. Mr rnddude (talk) 08:38, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]