Talk:Battle of Alclud Ford

Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms Stub‑class Mid‑importance

	Anglo-Saxon England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anglo-Saxon KingdomsWikipedia:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsTemplate:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsAnglo-Saxon Kingdoms
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medieval Scotland Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medieval Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Medieval Scotland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Medieval ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject Medieval ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject Medieval ScotlandMedieval Scotland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Military history: British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

King Ulf

Major problem here. There was no "Theodulf". If this comes from the Mammoth Book... then so much the worse. The best you can get is that Ida had a son Theodoric - this is nowhere near "Ulph" Freuchie (talk) 10:21, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not only that, but just because he was called King Ulph does not necessarily mean he was reigning at the time. As the son of a King he could have had the courtesy title king - as was commonplace elsewhere not long afterwards Freuchie (talk) 10:23, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Battle

The idea that this battle took place around 580 is ludicrous. Urien would have been over 100 years old. 550 is the latest feasible date, especially given that the Siege of Lindisfarne (where Urien was assassinated) necessarily came later.

I see that no-one has responded to my earlier remarks from 5 years ago, so I intend to rewrite any time. Freuchie (talk) 17:07, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]