Talk:Battle of Abukir (1799)

France Mid‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Turkey Mid‑importance

	Turkey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Egypt Mid‑importance

	Egypt portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: European / French / Ottoman

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	Ottoman military history task force

The 'battle' section is poorly written and could really use an overhaul. - March 2013 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.1.24.170 (talk) 11:02, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The battle section is a terrible and poor translation of the same article on the French wikipedia page...... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.98.70.136 (talk) 14:37, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

These citations seem to fit well from these two publications. I will try to find the last needed reference to the combat between Murat and Mustafa, and hopefully add it soon. Comments?--Paraballo (talk) 04:37, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The casualties of the Turks amount to 18,000. The article says they only had 16,000. Why? 208.59.171.27 (talk) 14:18, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed the same thing. The captured number must also include some of the wounded, 2,000 to be exact. Or they revived some of the dead. Either way, we need to fix these stats.Tubbyty (talk) 04:04, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed the table, but not the body of the article. I found two books online, both have around 13,000 casualties, significantly higher than what is currently stated. Unfortunately, I do not have access to the reference cited for most of the body. Anyone help?Tubbyty (talk) 04:44, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AsparagusTips (talk) 21:16, 5 December 2012 (UTC) The balance sheet says 4,000 Turks drowned and the table states 11,000 drowned. Which is correct?[reply]

"Abukir"

In line 1, it says "the Battle of Abukir (or Abukir)"... Is there supposed to be another name in the bracket? Perhaps Abu Qir?The Average Wikipedian (talk) 15:43, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uspzor (talk • contribs) 13:57, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Under the convention, the British army came back in France.

There's a paragraph that ends with this sentence

Under the convention, the British army came back in France.

I have no idea what this means. Could someone explain?

Montalban (talk) 06:41, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It was just wrong. It's right now. Uspzor (talk) 13:54, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Translation issues

There are some translation problems. Here is one sentence that is incomprehensible. "Murat dared not to overload as he saw the shot that struck above his head." Is it possible that 'overload' should be 'charge'? Even with this change the sentence does not sound right. Djmaschek (talk) 22:08, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, it's a mistranslation for "charge". The whole § does not make much sense because it is a automatic translation. It is perhaps not worth to translate it from scrap, because the French article has no source and doesn't seem very reliable (full of doubtful colorful "heroic" details, probably from some embellished 19th c. accounts).--Phso2 (talk) 17:05, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

French victory

All the article explains this is a French victory but you wrote Ottoman victory in the box. This looks absurd. I changed it accordingly. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:CB1C:839:9400:8D20:5193:AAB:DAE5 (talk) 20:22, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]