Jump to content

Talk:Batman: The Killing Joke (film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Plot

[edit]

I just wrote the plot, AFTER SEEING THE MOVIE TWICE (once to see it, and twice to write the plot). so please, don't delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drumerwritter (talkcontribs) 06:19, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I rewrote the plot (again after seeing the movie-again-twice), so please DO NOT DELETE IT. (P.S: just for everyone to know, if you keep deleteing it i'll keep re-posting it) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drumerwritter (talkcontribs) 23:27, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Schoolboy-like grammar mistake

[edit]

I deleted had been escaped,as any american speaker(ps:i'm not american, but i have an advanced level of english speaking and writting) can see this is downright wrong, and replaced it with had escaped, wich is the correct way of writting.

Please take note:
had been escaped should be "had been escaped"
"american" should be "American" (error made twice)
"i'm" should be "I'm" and "i" should be "I"
"english" should be "English"
"writting [sic]" should be "writing" (error made twice)
had escaped should be "had escaped"
"wich [sic]" should be "which"
I don't know where you come from, friend, but if this dog's breakfast of spilt alphabet soup represents an "advanced level of english [sic] writting [sic]" where you come from, then I would not like to see who might typify the average.Myles325a (talk) 06:59, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reception?

[edit]

Considering it made it's budget back in only 2 showings unadvertised in theaters I'm not sure anyone can call it anything but a wild success. Might want to add a section where it was WILDLY successful among fans. 65.29.77.61 (talk) 22:00, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Should we mention somewhere how the Bruce/Barbara relationship was already revealed in 2014 via this comic?

All the responses here make it seem like this is news, but it's OLD news. Ranze (talk) 01:01, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Theatrical film?

[edit]

Should this movie, along with Batman: Return of the Caped Crusaders, be considered a theatrical film? Even though it had a limited release in theaters, it is not considered a theatrical film by Warner Bros. Warner Bros.'s theatrical films (live action or animated) opens with "Warner Bros. presents" while direct-to-video films do not do that. This movie does not open with "Warner Bros. presents" and instead opens with the Warner Bros. Animation logo in the same manner as the last DC comics-based direct-to-video film Justice League vs. Teen Titans. And in the Warner Bros. Animation article also, it is, along with Batman: Return of the Caped Crusaders, listed under Direct-to-video features instead of Feature-length films. - Ash wki (talk) 13:26, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Original research?

[edit]

There's a line reading "It is not the first time that Brian Azzarello has depicted the Joker as a rapist.[37]," with the cited material being an issue of a comic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.143.231.125 (talk) 06:49, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]