Talk:Bathimpact

This page was proposed for deletion by 17jiangz1 (talk · contribs) on 12 November 2020.

Title of The bath impact?

Is this the best title for the page? I would have thought "Bath Impact" would have been a more appropriate title for the page...

--Mintchocicecream 02:15, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, I see the problems. It looks like Bath Impact isn't blocked, but Bath impact is blocked. Move notice added. If there is no objections I will make a formal request on Wikipedia:Requested Moves. This article now looks substantial enough to be considered at least a notable stub to me and thus should not be removed! --Mintchocicecream 16:13, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

--Mcmadhatter 16:14, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it would - but you can't create a page called Bath Impact, becuase of some anal american moderators who deleted the page because impact wasn't as well published as Ivy league papers form Havard , Yale etc, - Unsuprising seeing as it is a British Publication - IN THE UK anyways so they have now put a block on pages of that name.

--Mcmadhatter 16:13, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moving it sounds like a good idea to me, there is more to be added to this page in the works

Moved. —Nightst a llion (?) 08:57, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

History-merge needed

I note the old Student Impact article was copied here & then a redirect put in place - It would have been better to do a WP:MOVE as this would have preserved the edit history, talk page etc.— Rod ^talk 17:46, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Done the history-merge. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:27, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

I noticed that a banner has been added suggesting "this article may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for companies and organizations." I have added a couple of references but does anyone else have anything which could show notability? Otherwise this should probably be nominated at AFD.— Rod ^talk 12:57, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]