Talk:Baskerville

Typography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Birmingham Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Birmingham, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Birmingham on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BirminghamWikipedia:WikiProject BirminghamTemplate:WikiProject BirminghamBirmingham
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

West Midlands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject West Midlands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of West Midlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.West MidlandsWikipedia:WikiProject West MidlandsTemplate:WikiProject West MidlandsWest Midlands
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Seriously?

"The perfection of his work seems to have unsettled his contemporaries, and some claimed the stark contrasts in his printing damaged the eyes."

The whole article, and this sentence particularly, seems laughably non-NPOV. I'm not going to edit it myself as an article on a typeface doesn't seem all that important to be NPOV, but I'm just pointing this out. 86.7.16.29 (talk) 20:51, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I did not put it there- but I think it is an interesting note, and most people on this page would probably be interested in it. I bought a few books on this font, I will try to come back and add sources on what is here in some time. This is such a beautiful font. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.61.87.247 (talk) 11:52, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What version of Baskerville is in the example graphic on the upper right of the aritcle?

I ask since I have 15 different versions of Baskerville, and none of those have the exact same small "a" as in the Wikipedia article upper right graphic — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.170.135.182 (talk) 10:19, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It says below. Baskerville Ten by František Štorm. Like the article says, a lot of Baskerville versions have a different 'a' based on derivative fonts created by Isaac Moore, very similar to Baskerville's. Blythwood (talk) 00:15, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Baskerville. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://typophile.com/node/45357

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:55, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Baskerville. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.castleton.edu/athletics/licensing/styleguide_08.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://typographyforlawyers.com/baskerville.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070101235619/http://typophile.com:80/wiki/Baskerville to http://typophile.com/wiki/Baskerville

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:06, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]