Talk:Basal reader
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Easy readers
[edit]I guess basal readers are just a part of the more general genre of easy readers? But there are no page or explanation an easy readers.
Easy readers are not nescessarily directed at schoolchildren.
RhinoMind (talk) 18:50, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Basal reader/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
This article really is off to a fine start. It's well written but its complete lack of sources, and a few instances of NPOV/OR prevent it from C-class status. |
Last edited at 07:31, 8 September 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 09:03, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Start-Class children and young adult literature articles
- Top-importance children and young adult literature articles
- Start-Class Linguistics articles
- Unknown-importance Linguistics articles
- Start-Class applied linguistics articles
- Applied Linguistics Task Force articles
- Automatically assessed Linguistics articles
- WikiProject Linguistics articles
- Start-Class education articles
- Unknown-importance education articles
- WikiProject Education articles