Talk:Barry Stanton

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Music Low‑importance

	Australia portal Barry Stanton is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Multiple tags applied

It's not surprising that this article is still a stub after nine years. It's a disgrace. Created in May 2006, it was tagged "verify" in August 2006. Fast forward and it still has no inline citations, but the tag has disappeared. The article constantly refers to Stanton by his first name, has an overall unencyclopedic tone, and has its share of unverified puffery. A large number of sentences have detailed knowledge of Stanton's personal life and attitudes, leading an impartial observer to wonder whether such content constitutes original research or brilliant research. One doesn't know at this time because of the complete lack of inline citations. Readers should not be put in the situation of scratching their heads about whether an article is fact, or part fact, part fiction! CaesarsPalaceDude (talk) 22:32, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've finally addressed many of these issues, hopefully the article is now more neutral in tone, with less original research and verified by more reliable sources.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 07:04, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Barry Stanton/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

stub: basic information supplied; needs: a good infobox, independent in-line references (especially for major claims e.g. #1 single), much more details (e.g. when/where born?), sections;Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 23:14, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 23:14, 30 August 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 09:02, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Barry Stanton Austn Womens Weekly Nov 1961.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:54, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]