Jump to content

Talk:Barrie Trinder

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 (talk14:48, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by Philafrenzy (talk) and Whispyhistory (talk). Nominated by Philafrenzy (talk) at 22:29, 15 June 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Barrie Trinder; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation

QPQ: No - Not done
Overall: Good work, makes for easy DYK review! Actually created on June 8 and a week later the article was long enough to qualify for DYK. The Earwig similarty percentage for Ref. #2 is a bit high (27%) but it looks like that this is due to quoting of book titles.
As for QPQ, the article was mostly written by User:Philafrenzy and this DYK was nominated by User:Philafrenzy, so the QPQ should also be done by User:Philafrenzy (the QPQ review was done by User:Whispyhistory). -- P 1 9 9   16:23, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review. As far as I know, the review can be done by any of the co-authors, or indeed donated by anyone, so I think the QPQ requirement is satisfied. (I think it was in return for working on Betty Clements.) Philafrenzy (talk) 21:29, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK, good enough for me. -- P 1 9 9   03:16, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]