A fact from Barrie Trinder appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 July 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that Barrie Trinder helped to raise industrial archaeology to a respected academic discipline in Britain? Source: Corby, R. John (1998-01-01). "Barrie Trinder, The Industrial Archaeology of Shropshire". Material Culture Review. ISSN 1927-9264
QPQ: - Not done Overall: Good work, makes for easy DYK review! Actually created on June 8 and a week later the article was long enough to qualify for DYK. The Earwig similarty percentage for Ref. #2 is a bit high (27%) but it looks like that this is due to quoting of book titles. As for QPQ, the article was mostly written by User:Philafrenzy and this DYK was nominated by User:Philafrenzy, so the QPQ should also be done by User:Philafrenzy (the QPQ review was done by User:Whispyhistory). -- P 1 9 9✉16:23, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the review. As far as I know, the review can be done by any of the co-authors, or indeed donated by anyone, so I think the QPQ requirement is satisfied. (I think it was in return for working on Betty Clements.) Philafrenzy (talk) 21:29, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]