Jump to content

Talk:Barber Osgerby

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:BarberOsgerby)

Requested move 25 June 2016

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. No objection, and seems like a sensible move.  — Amakuru (talk) 20:52, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]



BarberOsgerbyBarber & Osgerby – Official website calls itself by this. Per MOS:TM, "leave compressed names as-is", but I can't find reliable sources that spell this with camelcase, although Barber Osgerby may be another option. — Andy W. (talk ·ctb) 17:45, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Addressing Issues

[edit]

The article has several issues flagged and I have jumped into seek to address them with ref to the wealth of information in external sources, also to correct some spelling errors and to add clearer structure and flow to it. Let me know any thoughts, comments or objections. Once I have text done I will seek some illustrations. StuartofAlbion (talk) 10:34, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Update: this page needs to be moved to 'Barber Osgerby', per companies house this has been the legal name of the business since 2008 and it is currently the name being used by the practice, notwithstanding the slightly ambiguous presentation on their website. Unless anyone objects in next few days I will act StuartofAlbion (talk) 17:04, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The main section, especailly once updated from 2015 to present, reads like a long list of projects. I intend to break it into three periods adding some context to each, and adding more to the first 'background' section. Any objections or thoughts please let me know here StuartofAlbion (talk)