Talk:Barbri

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Dallas-Fort Worth (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dallas-Fort Worth, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Dallas-Fort WorthWikipedia:WikiProject Dallas-Fort WorthTemplate:WikiProject Dallas-Fort WorthDallas-Fort Worth

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lawsuits

I removed the section on the lawsuits and the external links related to them as they were eating the article - especially the subsection on Ryan Rodriguez v. West Publishing Corp, which was as large as the entire non-lawsuit part of the article. I don't know if the lawsuits belong in the article at all, but since there was no easy way to summarize them, I just nuked the whole section. Before re-adding, please a) consider how much weight (if any) is appropriate in the context of the entire article and b) consider whether details about the lawsuit would be more appropriatly placed in their own article. --Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 11:27, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes the lawsuits are relevant. There is a near monopoly on Bar review classes and tuition has soared in recent years. The rices about to go up again because of the new rivaled equity investor and plummeting law student matriculation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.100.47.212 (talk) 04:07, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 1 December 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. wbm1058 (talk) 04:39, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BarBri → Barbri – Per WP:TITLETM, organization titles should follow conventional capitalization, except in rare cases. Ibadibam (talk) 18:19, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support, a brief examination over use in books in print shows that the lowercase version is as likely to be used in the wild as the camelcase. bd2412 T 18:26, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. I would support a move to "BARBRI" instead, since that is closer to the original acronym and seems to be what they are using nowadays. It's like how SAT and AARP are still capitalized even though they no longer officially mean anything. --Coolcaesar (talk) 19:38, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Do we write AARP and SAT instead of Aarp and Sat because they were formerly initialisms, or because we still pronounce them as initialisms (eɪ.jeɪ.jɑr.piː), instead of as words (ɑrp)? By comparison, scuba, radar, Interpol and sonar are all written in normal case. BAR/BRI's videos on YouTube appear to pronounce it as a word (ˈbɑr.briː). Is there a Wikipedia guideline for "orphan" acronyms? Ibadibam (talk) 00:15, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose and support "BARBRI per Coolcaesar.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:38, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support. A cursory look at Google News show that sources don't consistently spell the title "BarBri".[1] The company itself appears to have moved away from the "BarBri" form as can be seen in all the running text on their website.[2] As such, MOS:TM would recommend not using that form. I think it's a matter of choosing between Barbri and BARBRI. I think MOS:CAPSACRS and MOS:ACRO would recommend Barbri, since the letters aren't pronounced indivudually, unlike Ibadibam's examples of SAT and AARP, especially as use in sources is inconsistent.--Cúchullain ^t/c 22:17, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Excellent analysis by Cuchullain. Andrewa (talk) 00:42, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support. As per Cuchullain. Tiggerjay (talk) 22:12, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.