Talk:Bantu Education Act, 1953

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bantu Education Act, 1953 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

South Africa: Politics Mid‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the South African politics task force.

Text of the law needed

I think one needs to provide the text of this Law. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hektorza (talk • contribs) 13:57, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yeah 41.144.1.138 (talk) 23:11, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kaffer in textbooks, source needed

Can anyone name the text book were this excerpt is from: "...this kaffer has stolen a knife, this kaffer is lazy..." I somehow thinkn this is made up.--41.17.196.52 (talk) 17:25, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

Much of this article is of the form "It is often said that ... <Bantu Education was bad>. But actually... <it wasn't that bad because...>", which is not actually "balanced" or NPOV as it describes one opinion as a fact whereas they are in fact both opinions. - htonl (talk) 09:28, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, a lot of it is propaganda. Opinions have their place, but what are the facts and relevant context to them? And how do they explain that Coloured/Indian/Blacks in South Africa that were educated under that system (essentially anyone over 35 - if their school wasn't burned down by the Anti-Apartheid movement) appear to be far better educated than the present generation. Who as we know now doesn't even have the most basic economic literacy as the #FeesMustFall nonsense illustrates. --41.150.232.76 (talk) 21:44, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bantu Education Department and Bantu Education Act 1953 are quite different.=

they should have separate pages, with links to follow to the other. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.151.61.67 (talk • contribs) 5:12, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

ok 105.245.102.24 (talk) 06:47, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@105.245.102.24 yeah I want 10 questions about the Bantu education 1953 and answer so please help me 41.116.109.151 (talk) 03:02, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why was black people salaries extremely low 165.165.96.41 (talk) 08:12, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bantu Education Act, 1953. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071230083858/http://www.ufh.ac.za:80/timeline.html to http://www.ufh.ac.za/timeline.html#
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://nmmu.ac.za/documents/mward/Bantu%20Education%20Act%201953.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051201041632/http://www.socsci.kun.nl:80/ped/whp/histeduc/apartheid.html to http://www.socsci.kun.nl/ped/whp/histeduc/apartheid.html
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://nmmu.ac.za/documents/mward/Bantu%20Education%20Act%201953.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:56, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Word choice

"...which was really not on the side of the black community". Really? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.82.4.77 (talk) 18:41, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Verwoed Quote Not Found in the Reference

The following is currently written in this Wiki article:

Hendrik Verwoerd, stated that:[2]

   "There is no place for [the Bantu] in the European community above the level of certain forms of labour ... What is the use of teaching the Bantu child mathematics when it cannot use it in practice?"

The source for the above quote (referenced 2) is a book called South Africa - The Rise and Fall of Apartheid (Clark & Worger). I have searched that book (electronic version) and cannot find the quote at all. Unless someone can come up with the genuine source, the quotation by Verwoed cannot be substantiated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.245.48.69 (talk) 20:35, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]