Talk:Banksia epica

Banksia epica is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 24, 2013.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 24, 2007	Featured article candidate	Promoted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 1, 2006.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Banksia epica is named after two epic journeys the first by Edward John Eyre in 1841 to cross the Nullarbor and the second by John Falconer in 1986 to collect specimens from the same area?

Australia: Western Australia / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Banksia epica is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Banksia: Plants Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Banksia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the plant genus Banksia and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.BanksiaWikipedia:WikiProject BanksiaTemplate:WikiProject BanksiaBanksia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Plants (assessed as Low-importance).

Archive: Talk:Banksia epica/Archive

Late comment

From Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Banksia epica

Support - Excellent work, for a recently discovered species even this amount of detail is great. The length is just right and covers plenty of what one needs to know and has, basically, all there is to know. From experience the region where this plant grows is very remote so great work collecting images of it in the field (I presume), and in Perth. Looking forward to the next Banksia instalment. HelloMojo 09:53, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Banksia epica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070904223300/http://asgap.org.au/banksSG/banksiasg-4-1.pdf to http://asgap.org.au/banksSG/banksiasg-4-1.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:07, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

URFA tidy-up

@Casliber: could you cite the first paragraph in "Distribution and habitat" on number and size of populations? No recent literature or updates to conservation status that I could see, so that done, it'll be good to go. Choess (talk) 18:44, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Casliber: sorry, one more tweak; what is the first paragraph of the description sourced from? Will sign off at URFA when fixed. Choess (talk) 21:45, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Choess: right then, fixed. Sorry took so long Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:53, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]