Talk:Banksia acanthopoda/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Review and comments forthcoming...

Reviewer: – VisionHolder « talk » 15:36, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Pass: I made a few small changes, most notably by using the Convert template. (I did notice an error in the handling of sigfigs when dealing with temps, but I have reported it to the template's talk page, and it should be fixed soon.) I used the template to ensure MoS was followed in regards to non-breaking spaces, which were not consistent on the page prior to the edit. All-in-all, it is well-written, thorough (given our current understanding of the plant), and appears to meet all MoS requirements.

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Good job! – VisionHolder « talk » 16:50, 12 February 2010 (UTC)