Talk:Balzac (band)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Balzac (band) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Editing
[edit]I'm currently editing the page of Balzac (band) so it has more information about the band and make it a friendly, good source of details about them. Even if I can handle English at a certain degree is not my mothers language so any help editing grammatical errors (and horrors ;]) is well received. Also, before reverting or deleting any change made by me please pass by "My Talk" area or this one so we can debate the subject correctly and openly. I'm following the The Misfits (band) page as a guideline since some people have made a great work on there specially user IllaZilla on the last few weeks. --Blodnatt13 (talk) 02:25, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Importance
[edit]I don't think there is any question that these guys are important enough to be on here. I mean, they have their own stores in Japan, and have even had their own cereal. However, this article needs a lot of cleaning up.Skullord 14:57, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
- We have plenty of articles on Japanese bands. In fact Wikipedia is one the most comprehensive resources on a lot of Japanese culture. this band easily passes the Wikipedia music guidelines. QQ 17:16, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
- It is not question that bands from Japan can be on English Wikipedia but this article does not list source. Without source meeting WP:RS this article is like fan project.Giocabene (talk) 06:01, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Capitalization?
[edit]Is this band's name BALZAC or Balzac? Whichever it is, the article title or the name as written in the article text should be consistent...218.102.220.129 05:30, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
YouTube links
[edit]This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it. Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed. I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy. In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 03:32, 10 November 2006 (UTC)