Talk:Baltic Pipeline System-II

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia: Technology & engineering / Economy / Politics and law Mid‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the economy of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the politics and law of Russia task force.

Map needed

It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Russia may be able to help!

Maps

The current scheme is very interesting; however, it is very hard to follow for people not familiar with geography with this region. Same applies to the map of pumping stations. I propose to create a classical map, probably based on this map by Transneft. It would be also practical if both–BTS-1 and BTS-2– are shown on the same map. Beagel (talk) 07:35, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I now search for coordinates of pump stations. If there will be a card for {{Location map}} it will be possible to put their labels through coordinates.--Andrey! 07:59, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Look also [map http://www.47news.ru/2006/04/07/21985/1.jpg] of [BTS article http://www.47news.ru/2006/04/07/21985/]--Andrey! 09:40, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:BSicon muKBFa.svg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:BSicon muKBFa.svg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Other speedy deletions

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:48, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Baltic Pipeline System-II. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071016151733/http://www.neurope.eu/articles/74317.php to http://www.neurope.eu/articles/74317.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:02, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]