Talk:Ballin' (Mustard and Roddy Ricch song)
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
usage online in internet culture?
[edit]Someone should write about that I think. It's a song that's often paired up with clips from Animan Studio 110.171.106.177 (talk) 06:56, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- If you look through the history you will see lots of people have tried to write about it but it has been reverted because nobody has provided and actual reliable source for the information, which is need per WP:V (otherwise it's original research (WP:OR) which is not allowed). If you can find a WP:Reliable source (not know your meme, youtube or other user generated sites, but something like a news report) then feel free to add, but I haven't been able to find any actually reliable sources, my self. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 07:08, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- would this https://www.followchain.org/what-is-animan-studios/ be considered reliable, I have no clue, it seems legit and not a peer reviewed thing but I'm rather new here so maybe you could clear this up for me 108.49.72.125 (talk) 21:56, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- A first look at their about page doesn't fill me with much hope of editorial oversight of the sort WP:RS is looking for. I would broadly agree with the sentiment expressed by JPxG over at this RSN discussion, that the site seems like an SEO content mill and would be best avoided. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 22:08, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- I see, thanks for clearing it up! 108.49.72.125 (talk) 02:53, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- A first look at their about page doesn't fill me with much hope of editorial oversight of the sort WP:RS is looking for. I would broadly agree with the sentiment expressed by JPxG over at this RSN discussion, that the site seems like an SEO content mill and would be best avoided. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 22:08, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- would this https://www.followchain.org/what-is-animan-studios/ be considered reliable, I have no clue, it seems legit and not a peer reviewed thing but I'm rather new here so maybe you could clear this up for me 108.49.72.125 (talk) 21:56, 5 March 2024 (UTC)