Talk:Ballbarrow

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This article contradicts itself. Which is correct?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.41.168.100 (talk • contribs) 23:50, February 19, 2006‎

Not sure what you mean --gilgongo (talk) 13:37, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Back when this comment was made, the article said, "It became a best seller in the UK... The ballbarrow only had limited success..." I assume that's what they meant. - SummerPhD (talk) 14:58, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notability flag

I have removed the notability flag because ballbarrows are certainly notable in the UK and Europe, having been used extensively over the last 30 years (see also merger proposal, which notes this Talk:James_Dyson#Merger_proposal_2) . --gilgongo (talk) 13:37, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article is based on one very brief independent reliable source. The article, such as it is, needs additional independent sources. - SummerPhD (talk) 15:01, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, but's that's a citation issue, not a notability one. --gilgongo (talk) 22:10, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The core of notability is "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". One brief independent reliable source would seem to indicate a brief mention in Wheelbarrow#Variations, such as the material already there. The rest is promotional material from the company. - SummerPhD (talk) 22:57, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Ballbarrow was ..

Past tense is correct. Google today provided zero results.

The claims made in this article, and wheelbarrow variations, are, as stated, company propaganda. Ask anyone who has used one on muddy ground. AnnaComnemna (talk) 08:08, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect: https://www.google.co.uk/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=dyson%20ball%20barrow --gilgongo (talk) 09:48, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ballbarrow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130618072657/http://content.dyson.co.uk/insidedyson/article.asp?aID=ballbarrow to http://content.dyson.co.uk/insideDyson/article.asp?aID=ballbarrow

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:37, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Illustration of BALL wheel

The illustration looks like a traditional wheel. If Dyson's ball was spherical, an illustration should show how it attaches to the hopper. 68.193.244.246 (talk) 19:42, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]