Talk:Ballantine Adult Fantasy series

Novels: Fantasy Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fantasy task force.

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Redlinks

Should the list include WP:Red links that indicate whether we have an article on the listed volume? Now it does not; every title in the precursors, proper, and leftovers is a blue link.

A couple hours ago there was one redlink in the list proper, for Something About Eve by James Branch Cabell. Some other listed novels by Cabell were linked to our article on Cabell's series, where Eve also fits. There they are listed with barely more specific information than here. I have redirected Something About Eve to that page but I wonder whether it should be the other way round: red links for all that lack articles, with added note such as "part of the Manuel series.

If my revision fits some policy or wisdom, what does that say about the continued list "That Never Were"? --P64 (talk) 01:30, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]