Talk:Baldwin Village, Los Angeles

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

BPS reference

Is this a legit citation for the Black P Stones gang sentence: http://www.streetgangs.com/topics/2004/061704target.html

? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ecnassianer (talk • contribs) 07:39, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Angelino Heights, Los Angeles, California which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 05:30, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Bunker Hill, Los Angeles, California which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 06:00, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Part of which?

This article says Baldwin Village is part of Crenshaw, Los Angeles
Baldwin Hills, Los Angeles says Baldwin Village is part of Baldwin Hills.
Baldwin Hills/Crenshaw, Los Angeles says it contains Baldwin Hills, Crenshaw, and Baldwin Village as separate entities.

Does anyone have any good sources or local knowledge? -- Beland (talk) 15:05, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, the LA Times map lists Baldwin Village separately as a part of Baldwin Hills/Crenshaw, but doesn't mention Crenshaw. -- Beland (talk) 15:10, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[1] says Baldwin Village is "in the Crenshaw area" and definitely not part of Baldwin Hills. (Formerly "The Jungle".) -- Beland (talk) 16:01, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The area can be "claimed" by several jurisdictions, and all claims should be noted, if they are found in Reliable sources and not simply on somebody's or some group's blog. I am not sure what the problem is to simply note the claims and the sources, if we have any. Also, the claims can vary depending on the era in which they were made. Perhaps User:Beland can explain what the problem is, for which I would thank this user. As for "local knowledge," that is not a Reliable source.BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 15:57, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, Google Maps is crowd-sourced and not acceptable as a source. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 16:01, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@BeenAroundAWhile: There is no problem listing competing claims; the problem is finding reliable sources. Which is why I was asking if anyone knew any. Local knowledge might be helpful in suggesting keywords or a place to look for reliable sourcing. Any pointers? -- Beland (talk) 21:25, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]