This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Baldwin Hills Dam disaster is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dams, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dams on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DamsWikipedia:WikiProject DamsTemplate:WikiProject DamsDam
I was only 3 when the dam broke and flooded my father's dental office with 4 feet of water, but didn't the dam failure occur when the reservoir was full beyond capacity with water due to heavy rain? This article discusses all sorts of speculative failure models but fails to mention the condition that initiated the failure. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.215.115.31 (talk) 15:56, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I know nothing specific about this case but logic would tell me that intake to a storage reservoir on the top of a hill like this would have to be controlled. This wouldn't be used in a flood control situation. With the small amount of rainfall annually in Southern California, even if dammed, I doubt a sustainable lake could form naturally in this location, there is no source of water. The bottom of the bowl is still sealed today, at best it gets muddy after a rainstorm. A dam should be designed to hold back water that will be in constant contact with one side. More water or less water should not affect that condition for a viable dam. Trackinfo (talk) 19:04, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Now I mentioned Richard N. Levine, who made photos of the dam break. We should ask him, if he would be so nice to donate one to wikipedia/commons. Then 17, nowadays he could be 71 (or 72). --Helium4 (talk) 20:17, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]