Talk:Baldi's Basics in Education and Learning

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Withdrew, September 1, 2023, see discussion.
Delete, June 4, 2018, see discussion.

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 23 September 2021 by reviewer Chess (talk · contribs).

Video games: Indie Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the indie task force.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --2607:FEA8:2060:57A:F4CE:A47A:8FC4:3D68 (talk) 00:01, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Try to find some Reliable Sources documenting the game.

If we cite some good, credible sources, it should be accepted next time. Félix An (talk) 06:40, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Move request

The reason why it should be moved to Baldi’s Basics in Education and Learning because it sholdn't be a draft article and also, only administrators can move it. 2600:1700:6180:6290:6896:B38E:192E:347F (talk) 22:28, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

the AFC submission should removed 2600:1700:6180:6290:6896:B38E:192E:347F (talk) 22:53, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Only administrators can do it because the article is not notable and should not be moved to article space. That is why the AFC is declined, and nothing has changed. -- ferret (talk) 23:42, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC acceptance

This might be a controversial one given the salting & what not but I believe I made the right move here. Pretty much none of the sources currently in the article were around at the time of the AfD. It looks like the subject is more likely than not to be notable at this point given the many independent reviews. I might be wrong and I apologize in advance if this gets AfD'd and it turns out I was wrong. Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 14:16, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Balds Basics Field Trip

Is the camping version of the game notable enough to warrant inclusion? --The Tips of Apmh (talk) 23:00, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@The Tips of Apmh I think it is.

) Oversized Lego spoon 64 (talk) 20:18, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Camping demo thingy made a couple years back could be section in this article, but defiantly not as a separate article. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 03:50, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Development Info

You need to include more about the development of Baldi's Basics, including the origins, early tests and unused content as stated in TetraBitGaming's videos about the game. 2601:203:C281:28F0:C877:2AFF:FE11:E83D (talk) 17:45, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you add Badsum screen reference?

there's a screen about Bad sum in Baldi's basics plus. 1 is an anti piracy, and finally is save data corruption 207.155.70.159 (talk) 21:11, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if that's notable enough for this article. Wikipedia isn't a place for random information added wherever the editor likes, everything needs to be here for a reason. This info may be included elsewhere, but whether it'll be included here or not is debatable. SuperWikiBrother (talk) 21:20, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Change to "(the) Baldi's Basics (series)"?

While the original Baldi game is the most popular in media, Baldi's Basics Classic Remastered and Baldi's Basics Plus are (becoming) way bigger than the original game (for instance, the entire "ARG" and secret messages a year after BBCR's release), so I want to propose to make this article about the series themselves. QwertyPc Game17 (talk) 21:28, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it would make more sense to create a separate article under the name "Baldi's Basics (series)", since this article has enough sources to show that it's noteworthy enough to be covered here. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 22:56, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]