Talk:Bailey Falter

Bailey Falter has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: November 5, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Baseball: Phillies Low‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Philadelphia Phillies (assessed as Low-importance).

California: Inland Empire Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Inland Empire task force (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

Passed. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:52, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bailey Falter/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 18:50, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: WikiOriginal-9 (talk · contribs) 18:38, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Comments:

I created his commonscat and added it to the external links section.
- Thanks!
There is a Phillies picture of him on Commons: File:Bailey Falter (cropped).jpg. I'll let you decide whether you want to add it or not.
- Eh, it's pretty low-quality, we'll leave it for now.
"pitching a scoreless inning in relief" If we're linking relief, we should probably link inning too.
- Done
"In his final season with Chino Hills, Falter had a 6–2 win–loss record and a 1.20 earned run average (ERA), and he struck out 97 hitters in 75+2⁄3 innings pitched" change to "In his final season with Chino Hills, Falter had a 6–2 win–loss record, a 1.20 earned run average (ERA), and he struck out 97 hitters in 75+2⁄3 innings pitched"
- Done
"in the fifth round, 144th overall, of the 2015 MLB draft" change to "in the fifth round, with the 144th overall pick, of the 2015 MLB draft"
- Done
"pitching two innings in relief for Philadelphia's 12–2 loss to the Colorado Rockies" change "for" to "in"?
- Don't like repeating "in". Changed to "during".

Spot checks:

Gelb, Matt (June 29, 2021). "Copying Koufax: Bailey Falter's 'unusual' delivery and his father's dream power long-strided journey to the Phillies". The Athletic. The New York Times
- The article "His season ended on July 6, when he was diagnosed with an ulnar collateral ligament injury of the elbow" but the ref doesn't say he was diagnosed that day.
  - Changed to "sustained".
- Article says "This delivery is modeled after Sandy Koufax, Falter's favorite childhood pitcher." but I don't see in the source where it says it was modeled after Koufax. I guess it's insinuated though since they both had long strides.
  - I mean, the article is called "Copying Koufax", and but I added a ref that explicitly says Falter employs a unique pitching delivery, taking a longer stride down the mound than most, saying he was inspired by Sandy Koufax.
- Everything else for this ref looks good.

"Phillies Post-2016 Top 30 Prospect Rankings: 21–25". Fox Sports. March 4, 2020
- Looks good.

"Cutters notebook: Falter's demeanor leads to better results". Williamsport Sun-Gazette. July 2, 2016
- Looks good.

"Cutters notebook: Falter throwing harder than he ever has". Williamsport Sun-Gazette. July 29, 2016
- Looks good.

Salisbury, Jim (December 1, 2020). "Bailey Falter Gets Long-Awaited Call". Baseball America
- Looks good.

Coffey, Alex (June 12, 2023). "Phillies don't have much starting pitching depth, but for now, they see Bailey Falter as their best option". The Philadelphia Inquirer
- Looks good.

Destin, Andrew (June 24, 2024). "An 'exhausted' Bailey Falter struggles again in Pirates' lopsided loss to Reds". Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
- Looks good.

Excellent article. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:38, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiOriginal-9 All comments addressed, thanks for your efficiency! — Ghost River 18:48, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. Nice work! ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:51, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.