Talk:Bagholder

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finance & Investment Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Holding the bag

There seems to be sufficient coverage of the phrase to expand this section, and possibly to create a stand-alone page for it, especially since the phrase is used in other contexts besides finance. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 01:46, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious source

The claim that the phrase relates to a bag of stolen goods seems dubious, even though it's been sourced to some random website. (Which even starts its explanation with "You can imagine...")

To me the phrase clearly relates to the victim of the ancient "pig in a poke" scam (the precursor to the modern penny share fraud), who is left holding a bag full of air or junk rather than the valuable animal they expected.

If you were a criminal gang confronted by the police with a bag of stolen goods, the obvious course of action would be to run away with the bag, or if it was too heavy, drop it and have everyone escape. Not leave the "stupidest member" to be arrested and potentially blab on his treacherous mates, while still losing the bag.

I haven't tagged it because I'm aware that OR doesn't trump a sourced assertion (no matter how logical the OR and how weak the source). --195.206.172.158 (talk) 11:50, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]