Talk:Bagenal's Castle
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help! | ![]() |
![]() | A fact from Bagenal's Castle appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 November 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 23:56, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Bagenal's Castle was originally thought to have been destroyed, but was rediscovered in 1996 in the premises of a bakery? Source: [1]
Created by Jurtaa (talk). Self-nominated at 19:17, 17 October 2021 (UTC).
The text is too similar to the sources. Whole sentences are taken from here with no (or only trivial) changes. Wikipedia articles have to be "in your own words". You cannot take a sentence and use it if someone else wrote it. Neither can you change it a bit. It needs rewording completely. Worth the effort, I think. Victuallers (talk) 22:02, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
i disagree, this is fixable—although I don't think it'll be a cake walk. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 21:03, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
this'll need another reviewer theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 22:41, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Hopefully I've managed to fix the issues, so another review would be good. Jurtaa (talk) 15:50, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Earwig isn't screaming at me, so that's a good sign. Heythereimaguy (talk) 00:25, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Okay...seems long enough and new enough. Coypvio unlikely (I'm assuming this is an improvement from the original review). The hook is interesting and short. @Jurtaa: do you have less than 5 DYK nominations? Heythereimaguy (talk) 12:35, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Heythereimaguy: Yes, this is my first DYK nomination. Jurtaa (talk) 13:06, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Jurtaa:
Well then, this is good to go. Heythereimaguy (talk) 19:41, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Jurtaa: