Talk:Back brace

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

SpineCor

http://www.scolibrace.com/pdf/posttreatmentresults.pdf SPINECOR: A non-rigid brace for the treatment of Idiopathic Scoliosis: Initial Post-Treatment Results. Eurospine 2003 12: 141-1 Christine Coillard, M.D., Michel A Leroux, Ph.D., Karl F, Zabjek, MSc., Charles Hilaire Rivard, M.D.

I've added spinecor brace information on the brace section. Above is a link to peer reviewed study on the brace. Below is another published study on it.

Survival analysis of a group of 365 idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with the Dynamic SpineCor Brace Résonances Eurospéenes Du Rachis. 14(43):p. 1782-1786. French. Vachon V, Coillard C, Zabjek KF, Rhalmi S, Rivard CH

Lower case name

This should be moved to back brace (lower case). 12.170.208.6 17:09, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

references

shouldn't references be moved to the end of the page instead of smack in the middle of it?

Here's a reference for the Charleston Brace: Effectiveness of the Charleston bending brace in the treatment of single-curve idiopathic scoliosis., Gepstein R, Leitner Y, Zohar E, Angel I, Shabat S, Pekarsky I, Friesem T, Folman Y, Katz A, Fredman B., J Pediatr Orthop. 2002 Jan-Feb;22(1):84-7, —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.255.39.87 (talk) 20:04, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of braces

The list of braces either needs independent, reliable sources to support each entry. Any entry without such references should be removed. Also, is the one reference just unpublished research? I couldn't find any publication info in it. --Ronz (talk) 23:09, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To consider when revising

I daresay this is going to sound a little bitter, but there should probably be information provided regarding brace failure. If I remember correctly, there's been some research done within the past few years which sheds some better light on the subject, and would make for a beneficial addition. Hopelessshade (talk) 01:46, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Issues with: Issues with Hard Bracing...

This portion of the article is inappropriately candid and unverified. Has a very "wiki how" air to it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pseudonymoniker (talk • contribs) 06:04, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More sources

I found a 1957 article by Norton et al, The immobilizing efficiency of back braces: their effect on the posture and motion of the lumbosacral spine. If you search for it in Google Scholar and see who cited it, you can probably find a lot of good information. Most recently, in 2010 Benoist and Lenoir authored Lumbar Orthoses to Prevent and Treat Low-Back Pain. II | (t - c) 03:42, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Needs images

The article should have an image for every back brace type. Where would such be found? Squish7 (talk) 03:47, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Back brace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100523010919/http://www.macleans.ca:80/science/health/article.jsp?content=20080123_55198_55198 to http://www.macleans.ca/science/health/article.jsp?content=20080123_55198_55198

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:06, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Milwaukee back brace.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:23, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]