Talk:Back Home Again in Indiana

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

United States: Indiana Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Indiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana (assessed as Mid-importance).

Jazz Low‑importance

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Nabors substitutes words, it is true. But the word "erroneous" is gratuitous. Songs can change over time, and Nabor's substitutions seem well thought out and sensitive. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.25.115.119 (talk) 13:06, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Original Research in Chords section?

Much of the information recently added in the Chords section seems to be original research to me. The only citations in that section are to published scores themselves, and the actual analysis of those documents does not have any citation. Indyguy (talk) 05:00, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

True. It's all uncited original research, and doesn't belong here. It's also out of place, a detailed theoretical analysis of the harmony of a pop tune belongs in a music theory text, or a book about early popular songs. It's just too much petty detail for an encyclopedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.68.134.1 (talk) 18:01, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]