Jump to content

Talk:Back Home Again in Indiana

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Untitled

[edit]

Nabors substitutes words, it is true. But the word "erroneous" is gratuitous. Songs can change over time, and Nabor's substitutions seem well thought out and sensitive. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.25.115.119 (talk) 13:06, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Original Research in Chords section?

[edit]

Much of the information recently added in the Chords section seems to be original research to me. The only citations in that section are to published scores themselves, and the actual analysis of those documents does not have any citation. Indyguy (talk) 05:00, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • True. It's all uncited original research, and doesn't belong here. It's also out of place, a detailed theoretical analysis of the harmony of a pop tune belongs in a music theory text, or a book about early popular songs. It's just too much petty detail for an encyclopedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.68.134.1 (talk) 18:01, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]