Jump to content

Talk:Babcock & Wilcox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attempting to bring page up to date, please do not revert

[edit]

We are attempting to update basic biographical information on this page with accurate details. 11/15/2016, and somebody keeps reverting back to inaccurate and out of date information. PLEASE do not revert back to info that is more than a year out of date and inaccurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.150.27.130 (talk) 20:41, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Major overhaul in progress

[edit]

I'm not clear on what needs to take place or which company's article should have which information. From the looks of one source, Babcock & Wilcox became BWX Technologies on July 1, 2015. That source also suggests the nuclear power related businesses go under that second article, which already existed but referred to a unit of Babcock & Wilcox. I did that, even though what I moved was promotional sounding. I'm not clear on what historical information should go where, but I'm treating Babcock & Wilcox as if it is the parent company and the company that was there all along. If anyone can figure out what should be done, they are certainly welcome to do so.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 16:48, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Babcock & Wilcox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:09, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Babcock & Wilcox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:22, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Babcock & Wilcox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:00, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:22, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New York City subway false claim

[edit]

The statement "In 1902, the New York City's first subway is powered by B&W boilers." is incorrect and misleading. The first subway line, the IRT, opened in october 1904, and was powered by electricity, not steam. If the "powered" refers to B&W steam boilers being used to power electric generators, it should be clarified. "The New York Subway: Its Construction and Equipment," published by the IRT in 1904 describes the boilers used in the power plant but does not mentioned who manufactured them. 68.230.153.193 (talk) 02:50, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

3 mile island accident

[edit]

why doesn't this article contain information on B&Ws components that led to the failure in three mile island? Wiki4chris (talk) 01:22, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]