Talk:Baal teshuva movement

A fact from Baal teshuva movement appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 October 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Baal teshuva movement refers to the phenomenon that began during the mid-20th century, whereby large numbers of previously highly-assimilated Jews chose to move in the direction of practicing Judaism?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/October.

Wikipedia

Judaism

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles

Religion: New religious movements

	Religion portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
	This redirect is supported by New religious movements work group.

Movement or simply Chazara Bit'shuva?

Please see the relevant 2 discussions regarding this article:

Where should the 2 above discussions be?

This header was created by me to divide the 2 subjects, please feel free to fix it.--יודל 21:37, 2 October 2007 (UTC) this is a partially copied discussion from an other articles talk before this page was created. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yidisheryid (talk • contribs) [reply]

Let's not have the discussions split up, let's have them in one place, at Talk:Baal teshuva#Should some of this article be split into Orthodox Jewish outreach?. Thank you, IZAK 15:49, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Since its already divided in 2 articles it can not be in one place anymore. so the talk regarding this article must be in this talk page, for its interest to address the concerns properly--יודל 16:14, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong! See: Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#Good practice also known as WP:MULTI:

Centralized discussion: Avoid posting the same thread in multiple forums. This fragments discussion of the idea, creating discussions in separate places with no interchange of ideas. This is rarely desirable, and leads to redundant effort where an idea that has already been adequately addressed has to be considered all over again. Instead, solicit discussion in only one location, either an existing talk page or a new project page, and if needed advertise that in other locations using a link. See also: meatball:ForestFire

If you find a fragmented discussion, it may be desirable to move all posts to one of the locations, removing them from the other locations and adding a link.

Thank you for noting the above. IZAK 17:19, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This policy is something entirely different, when 2 discussions have the same meaning and subjects it must be centralized, but since this particular page was created becaouse and in despite with utmost disregard for consensus, so the whole discussion turns to something really different now and should be brought into its own proper context, which is entirely different then the privies discussion, since here is its main application for its context to be right, when the discussion will have some time and more voices added, it should be seen into if it is of any resemblance the subject, and then we will have one centralized discussion as we see fit, for its broader context each as it was further framed at its relevant frame.--יודל 17:35, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong again! Re-read WP:MULTI. I cite you the exact rules and you argue, how crazy is that? You are making up your own rules, and as usual you devote more time to arguing your own imagined ideas of procedures and policies to the point of the absurd which does not contribute anything to Wikipedia. Even according to you it's crazy: On the one hand you argue for combining articles but on the other hand you also argue for separate discussion pages, is that "logic" or what? Well let me tell you, I do not enjoy your theater of the absurd. Leave me out of your craziness please. IZAK 17:46, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since the last note was not about the issue at hand but about something else, there is at this time no more to be said on this issue.--יודל 17:59, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Baal teshuva movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.wherewhatwhen.com/read_articles.asp?id=342
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.jerusalemletter.co.il/archives/Feb4,1998/why.htm
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://ohr.edu/tapes/speaker.php?id=13

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:09, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Baal teshuva movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.jerusalemletter.co.il/archives/Feb4%2C1998/why.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080317104136/http://worldwidereligions.net/articles/The-basis-of-JUDAISM.html to http://worldwidereligions.net/articles/The-basis-of-JUDAISM.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:49, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]