Talk:BDO USA

Chicago C‑class Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Taxation (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TaxationWikipedia:WikiProject TaxationTemplate:WikiProject TaxationTaxation

Business: Accounting

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Accounting task force.

Litigation - NPOV

Tagged as having dubious NPOV as the addition does not speak on all of the relevant facts of the case. Suggest modifying this to either delete this section or include a discussion on BDO's defense. Furthermore, the second citation is solely just speculation at this point - this complaint has not been asserted in a court of law. Insbordnat (talk) 01:36, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The NPOV should result in removal since facts are not supportive as to FINAL considerations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vumba (talk • contribs) 18:44, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 10:56, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Updates to the Miami Bank Fraud Controversy

In May 2011 there was an update to the facts of the Miami Bank Fraud controversy. As such, I'm suggesting updating the Miami Bank Fraud section (pending feedback) to state:

In August 2007 a jury in Miami awarded Banco Espirito Santo $521.7 million--$170 million in compensatory damages and nearly $352 million in punitive damages--over allegedly negligent audits that BDO conducted on a corrupt Espirito Santo subsidiary. On June 23, 2010 the Third District Court of Appeal of the state of Florida unanimously overturned the 2007 jury verdict against BDO, ruling that the firm had been denied a fair trial, and ordered that the case be retried in the 11th Circuit Court. ^[1] In May of 2011, BDO USA, LLP entered into confidential settlement agreement with Banco Espirito Santo which resolved the lawsuit against BDO. ^[2]

Pending any objections or discussion, I'd like to make the change to this section on January 24th. (JAMorrissey (talk) 22:25, 10 January 2012 (UTC))[reply]

References

^ Court Overturns $521.7M Verdict in BDO Case, Accounting Today, June 23, 2010
^ BDO USA Settles Bankest Suit With Former Client Banco Espirito Santo, Bloomberg, May 5, 2011

Where does the acronym "BDO" come from?

Seems pretty basic information to include in an encyclopedia article on the company. More importantly, this article reads like an advertisement, brochure, or press release by the firm itself. Needs stricter, non-biased editing. Benefac (talk) 23:04, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[acountingtoday-1] Court Overturns $521.7M Verdict in BDO Case, Accounting Today, June 23, 2010

[bloom-2] BDO USA Settles Bankest Suit With Former Client Banco Espirito Santo, Bloomberg, May 5, 2011

[1]

[2]