Jump to content

Talk:BC Place

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dome collapse

[edit]

This JUST happened at roughly 12:50pm PST - Jan 5th 2008 

 - part of the roof has suffered a failure and collapsed inward.

Early in the development of this story, there appears to be a lot of unsupported assertions about the nature of the collapse, location of damage, cutting of power,gfjfgjfget etc. This needs to be cited somewhere. If someone has a link to an article to substantiate this, please cite. pbryan 22:03, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[National Post]

NO IT DID NOT COLLAPSE

[edit]

Enough with the hysterical exaggerations. The roof was intentional deflated due to a torn fabric panel. I expect misinformation from the mainstream media, but is it too much to ask of Wikipedia too stick to the facts about what actually happened.


Also:

(quote from BCPlaceStadium.com):

Vancouver, BC, January 5, 2007) – Early this afternoon a portion of the roof at BC Place Stadium was damaged and subsequently deflated. Beyond the bad weather, no direct cause for this incident has yet been determined.


Emergency personnel were notified immediately to assess the threat. The complete building has been evacuated and surrounding roads have been closed.


“Public safety and security is our priority and any threat of this nature is taken seriously,” said Howard Crosley, General Manager at BC Place Stadium. “Our staff executed the evacuation procedure efficiently and effectively.”


More information will be posted on the BC Place Stadium website (www.bcplacestadium.com) as soon as it is available.


Further information will be made available to the media by 2PM.

Sandtrooper 22:09, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to AM 980, a small rip in the fabric led to the collapse of the roof. They stated that it was a controlled deflation of the roof to prevent any injury to personnel on the turf at the time.WoodenFeet 22:58, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From the BC Place website: 

BC Place Stadium roof panel suffers repairable tear

Vancouver, BC - At 1PM today, there was a tear in the west panel of the roof at BC Place Stadium. The cause of the tear has yet to be determined.

Howard Crosley, General Manager at BC Place Stadium, said:

“Because of the tear, we activated a controlled deflation of the stadium roof. Everyone in the building was evacuated safely and the public were not in danger at any time.”

“We are currently assessing the damage. Our major concern right now is the water accumulation if it continues to rain and snow, but we are addressing this issue.”

“The good news is that the tear occurred only in one panel and it is repairable. A replacement panel will be flown in here for early next week.”

“There are no events booked at BC Place for the next 20 days, so at this time we do not anticipate any being affected. It is business as usual.”

“This is the first time in BC Place history that there has been an issue with the roof, which is inspected each year on a regular basis. The last inspection was in August 2006 and the roof was reported to be in good condition.”

WoodenFeet 00:14, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reason for Collapse

[edit]

There have been suggestions that the weight of the snow brought down the stadium. From a pure guess, I'm going to suggest that the real reason why the dome came down is because the stadium/roof was de-pressurized.

The tear occured due to unknown reasons. The first response of the Staff, as required, was to increase the power of the fans. This was not productive, and the so fans were made to depressurize the stadium, which allowed for the roof to lower.

Largest air-supported dome in world

[edit]

My research indicates BC Place is the largest air-supported domed stadium in the world. Sources include CBC News, other news wires, major sports publishers. It would be nice to find a definitive source to cite. pbryan 07:23, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I checked some of your sites that Google brought up and they say it "has" been the largest in the world. They don't claim it is any longer. Also how do you qualify "largest"? RCA Dome in the US has a higher capacity. Gateman1997 23:28, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This seems pretty definitive: "As the world's largest air supported domed stadium, BC Place is also home to the province's largest trade and consumer shows including the Boat Show, Home Show and Auto Show." (BC Place Stadium official site - click on "About Us" link and view third paragraph). Seems to be expressed in the present tense. Good question about the definition of largest. Largest by air volume? Largest by area? Largest by number of attendees it can cover? pbryan 01:26, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It is largest by area Jeffy b 05:01, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Section 16 Image

[edit]

I took this photo of section 16 in the stadium. Could someone place it where you feel right? I just can't decide. File:BCPlaceStadiumSection16.JPG Thanks!--Canadianshoper 04:30, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bcplacelogo.gif

[edit]

Image:Bcplacelogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:38, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pressurization

[edit]

The article currently says "The internal air pressure was three times normal at the time of the tear". Clearly "pressure" here is not meant to include the normal atmospheric pressure, but only the amount of pressurization above that. I suggest substituting a wording including the word "pressurization".

Also -- and this is the reason I don't just fix it -- is "three times normal" correct? The cited reference (the CBC article) has: "Engineer Kris Hamilton, who is conducting a report of the incident, said there was three times more pressure on the roof than there was supposed to be." Three times more than normal is an ambiguous usage today: traditionally it means four times normal, but today many people use it to mean three times normal. So what did Hamilton mean?

All the other reports I can find on the web that go into this detail just quote the same sentence. Does anyone have a cite that mentions that actual pressures, so we can straighten this out? If not, the article should probably be reworded to quote Hamilton as well, ambiguity and all. 207.176.159.90 01:21, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Original construction costs

[edit]

although it's present in Infobox Stadium's data fields when viewed in edit, the original construction cost ($123 million) does NOT display on the page; nor is there any mention of it in the article itself. Costs are not mentioned at all until the recently-finished restoration/redesign ($563 million). Political controversies over spending on this stadium, originally and currently, are also absent, but partly hard to cite because so-called "reliable sources" (mainstream media) make a point of avoiding them. The hope that the stadium would be named Terry Fox Stadium is also not mentioned (Terry Fox Plaza and accompanying arch were a sop to that sentiment) but in order to cite that would take extensive digging in newspaper archives....why re Infobox Stadium do those fields not diplay?174.118.88.3 (talk) 15:15, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Name?

[edit]

What is the official name of this venue? Is it "BC Place" or "BC Place Stadium"? Their official website domain is bcplacestadium.com, but all of the marketing within the site seems to refer only to "BC Place". phreakydancin (talk) 04:09, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://bcplace.com/ is also their official website. It is most commonly referred to as BC Place. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:53, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Turf controversy

[edit]

Shouldn't there be a section on the controversy about the turf? It's both in relation to MLS (see: http://www.canadiansoccernews.com/index.php?/page/articles.html/_/aftn/robbie-keane-slams-unacceptable-bc-place-pitch-r4139) and all the criticism of using BC Place for the WWC 2015 final. Sameerkanal (talk) 01:40, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not really. It's only a controversy to some in that league & for that tournament. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:48, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Are you serious? MLS is the second-biggest tenant in the facility, and it's the host of a final match in a major international tournament. Sameerkanal (talk) 01:40, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on BC Place. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:09, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on BC Place. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:30, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on BC Place. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:18, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{{Infobox venue}} image width

[edit]

@Walter Görlitz: The information displayed in {{Infobox venue}} is too crammed, and the Infobox needs to be a larger width so that a) parameters with a single line can form without being crunched into second lines unnecessarily, and b) the infobox doesn’t stretch as far down on the page, giving the images in the article body some space to actually display somewhat near the parts they were placed alongside, especially in the first “History” section. – PhilipTerryGraham (talk · contribs · count) 21:01, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is it too crammed? Increase your thumbnail size. It does not need to be larger as doing so interferes with the thumbnail size that others select. If you insist on having some words or phrase on a single line, which is not needed at all, use {{nowrap}}. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:20, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:BC_Place&oldid=1206203928"