Talk:BBC Sports Unsung Hero Award

BBC Sports Unsung Hero Award is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 16, 2009	Peer review	Reviewed
August 15, 2009	Featured topic candidate	Promoted
March 20, 2013	Good article nominee	Not listed
April 8, 2013	Featured list candidate	Promoted
January 24, 2024	Featured topic removal candidate	Demoted
Current status: Featured list

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Awards Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:BBC Sports Unsung Hero Award/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The C of E (talk · contribs) 22:06, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this and my first thought is that it's mainly lists about the winners which unfortunately under the criteria is not eligible for GA status, you might like to try WP:FL. I think the prose needs a lot of expansion before you can really consider this an article suitable for GA status.

My review of the page as it stands:

The prose does rely quite heavily on primary sources from the BBC which I think ought to be addressed somehow
- Reading WP:WIAGA, it doesn't suggest that this is really necessary. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:47, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I think the first paragraph could do with more sources in it
- Can you be specific on which sentences require more sources for verification please? The Rambling Man (talk) 09:47, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
In the list, no need to repeat a reference if you've already put it in that list in the same entry
- Not necessarily, if you're looking for "more" sources in the lead, why wouldn't it be practical to source the individual facts in the table? The Rambling Man (talk) 09:47, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Only print source's names should be in italics
- Can you show me where that's the case in the MOS? The {{cite web}} instructions say "work: Title of website".... The Rambling Man (talk) 09:47, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No need to link the name of the publisher if it's already been linked
- Not necessarily, as long as the linking is consistent, then relinking is fine because you don't know which reference a reader may click first and so you don't know which instance of the publisher will be shown first. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:47, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The page at the moment appears neutral, broad and follows the MOS however I do not feel it is anywhere near ready for GA status and I think it would be much better served as a Featured List. I'll leave it to you to decide how you want to proceed. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 22:06, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a minimum requirement for prose? In the past I've seen plenty of good articles with much less prose than this? The Rambling Man (talk) 09:41, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's not the prose alone, it's that it's outnumbered by the lists. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 09:45, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Where is that specified in the criteria please? The Rambling Man (talk) 09:57, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:GACR, the section titled What cannot be a good article. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 10:03, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see where it says that prose shouldn't be outnumbered by lists. Perhaps you could be more specific? The Rambling Man (talk) 10:09, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's linked to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Stand-alone lists. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 10:15, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well that depends if you think this is a SAL or not. Clearly you do which renders this nomination pointless. I'll withdraw it, thanks. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:25, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm saying that in my opinion it would be better serves listed as a FL than a GA. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 10:27, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I understand what you're saying. Hence I'd like to withdraw the nomination. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:52, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on BBC Sports Unsung Hero Award. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:08, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]