Talk:Béla II of Hungary/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 01:19, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Article contains a tag in "Early years until 1131"

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   The following images are tagged as needing a US public domain tag: [1], [2], [3]

   I fixed the tagging issues myself.

7. Overall: Other than these few minor image issues and the tag, the article is good to go.--¿3family6 _contribs 00:59, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Issue addressed, it is good to go! Nice job, Borsoka!

3family6, I found and added the relevant information. Thank you for your patience. Borsoka (talk) 12:19, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

1. Pass/Fail:

---