Talk:Båtsfjord Airport

Båtsfjord Airport has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 2, 2013. (Reviewed version).

Aviation: Airports

	Aviation portal This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
	This article is supported by the airport project.

Norway

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Arctic Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arctic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arctic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArcticWikipedia:WikiProject ArcticTemplate:WikiProject ArcticArctic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Båtsfjord Airport/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Samuelled (talk · contribs) 10:28, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seems legit.

Closing this "drive by" review, one of three by this user. Pyrotec (talk) 17:33, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Båtsfjord Airport/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Neonblak (talk · contribs) 17:26, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Shame that this has been waiting for so long. I will rectify that. I have done an initial read-through and the prose is smooth and concise. I should complete the review sometime today, as the article is fairly short.Neonblak ^talk - 17:26, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Review

Lead - No issues, summarizes the article well. All three photos used are released through Creative Commons, and the article is free from bad disamb links. All references are active and relevant to the topic.

History

"The first airline to operate to Båtsfjord were Varangfly, later renamed Norving, who flew seaplane taxi and ambulance flights in the early 1960s." - Shouldn't is be "Båtsfjord was Varangfly"? Single Airline, and refering to one entity? Also, I would wikify seaplane and ambulance flights (med air?).
"The CAA stated that instead the a new airport should be built..." - Remove the "a".
"In April 1995 when Parliament decided to nationalize twenty-six regional airports owned by their respective municipalities. They also debated a proposal to build a new airport in Båtsfjord." - Was this suppose to be one sentence? "In April 1995, when Parliament decided to nationalize twenty-six regional airports owned by their respective municipalities, they also debated a proposal to build a new airport in Båtsfjord."

I would also use non-breaking spaces in all the dates like "April 1995" and "9 September 1999", or any other instances of a number relating directly to word following it, like measurements "17 steps" and "120 passengers".

That's all I saw, the rest looks great. The information appears factual, neutral, free from original research, stable, broad enough in coverage with no unnecessary irrelevant information. I will put this on hold until these few concerns are address, and look forward to passing this article.Neonblak ^talk - 19:15, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure how long you wish to wait on this, but User:Arsenikk has been inactive for no apparent reason for more than two months. Instead of waiting indefinitely for him to come back, maybe you should close the review. You could pass or fail the article; the former because the issues appear to be minor and fixable by anyone who wishes to be bold, or the latter because Arsenikk can easily renominate it when he returns. V C 14:10, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't going to wait indefinitely, but I didn't think there was much harm in being patient. Just a few days ago, I look into the guidelines to see if it prohibited me from making the changes myself and then passing the article. If it were content issues, I would fail and close it, but wasn't sure on grounds of grammar and punctuation. Since I have little plans today, I may just make the changes myself and pass it.Neonblak ^talk - 15:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Båtsfjord Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.regjeringen.no/upload/OED/pdf%20filer/Barentshavet_S/KI/14_Luftfart.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120528113400/http://www.avinor.no:80/en/airport/batsfjord/tofromairport to http://www.avinor.no/en/airport/batsfjord/tofromairport
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.regjeringen.no/Upload/SD/Vedlegg/rapporter_og_planer/2012/rapp_ruter_2013.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:19, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Båtsfjord Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120106002505/http://ec.europa.eu/transport/air/internal_market/doc/2009_12_pso-eu_and_eea.pdf to http://ec.europa.eu/transport/air/internal_market/doc/2009_12_pso-eu_and_eea.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:07, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]