This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthroponymyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthroponymyTemplate:WikiProject AnthroponymyAnthroponymy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
@Biruitorul:,
it's true since also Hungarians outside the country, or their descendants born in other countries may not use the diacritics anymore, shall they have given name or family name, however I don't debate anything else you said, but I tried to have a compact and all inclusive short description.(KIENGIR (talk) 16:45, 16 January 2021 (UTC))[reply]
I don’t mind including a note regarding the Hungarian diaspora. On the other hand, this is true of any name outside its country of origin, e.g. Kovács are called Kovacs in America/Canada/England/Australia, Tóth are Toth, etc. - BiruitorulTalk17:44, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
