Talk:Azazel in rabbinic literature
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Djinn etc
[edit]There's something fishy about the article and the Encyclopedia entry it's hoiked from. The main problem I have is that it's inherently contradictory about what exactly Nachmanides' opinion was. I think that the source text includes a typo. Perhaps it should read that modern scholars diagree with Ibn Ezra / Nachmanides. I'm looking into the issue. --Dweller 14:27, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- all agreed then and merged back. Casliber (talk · contribs) 14:03, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
I don't think this page is noteworthy or interesting enough to stand on its own, and could definitely be merged back into the Azazel article. This would also provide a good opportunity to fact-check it, rewrite it, and boil it down to its essentials to prevent the repetition of material between the Rabbinic Literature section and the rest of the Azazel article. Thoughts? --Makaristos (talk) 15:29, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Merge sounds good--Alpha166 (talk) 15:35, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Agreed, though someone actually needs to do the work.
- The parent article is not exactly outstanding either.
- People have supplied us with material worth working with, but work it needs. Alastair Haines (talk) 10:39, 25 April 2009 (UTC)