Talk:Azati Prime

Azati Prime has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: December 12, 2013. (Reviewed version).

Television: Episode coverage

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Star Trek High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Azati Prime appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 December 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the computer model for the future version of the Enterprise seen in the Star Trek:Enterprise episode "Azati Prime" was created in only a few hours?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Azati Prime.

Wikipedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Azati Prime (ENT episode).jpg

Image:Azati Prime (ENT episode).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:38, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:USS Enterprise NCC-1701-J.jpg

The image Image:USS Enterprise NCC-1701-J.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:16, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Azati Prime/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ruby2010 (talk · contribs) 23:58, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I shall review this, hopefully within the next few days. Thanks, Ruby 2010/2013 23:58, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

"The guest actors who portrayed members of the Xindi Council appeared in this episode..." - this reads weird, maybe because it isn't clear when they portrayed the members? Suggest a rewrite

Redrafted. Miyagawa (talk) 23:30, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

" In this episode, the crew track the Xindi superweapon down to a planet..." -> In this episode, the crew track a Xindi superweapon down to a planet...

Changed from "the" to "a". Miyagawa (talk) 23:30, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"...and Captain Jonathan Archer (Scott Bakula) seeks to destroy in a suicide attack." What is Archer trying to destroy? The weapon? Needs rewording.

Clarified. Miyagawa (talk) 23:30, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

% vs percent - consistency needed

Changed to percent. Miyagawa (talk) 23:30, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

" "Azati Prime" received Nielsen ratings of 2.6/4%, and critical reaction was mostly positive with praise directed at the pacing of the episode and the plotting of the overall arc." -- verging on a run-on sentence, could use a comma somewhere in there

Edited. Miyagawa (talk) 23:30, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Xindi is overlinked

Fixed - also noted I had Captain Jonathan Archer (Scott Bakula) in there twice too. Miyagawa (talk) 23:30, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Meanwhile, Archer orders Enterprise destroys a Xindi facility on the planet's moon so that it cannot reveal the ship's presence." -- could use a copyedit
Explain who or what Jannar is (like you do for Degra)

It was Archer's first time meeting Jannar in this episode (the audience saw him in Xindi Council meetings), so I've simply explained that he is also a Xindi. Miyagawa (talk) 23:30, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"As Archer begins to convince them that Starfleet did not start the conflict, but Dolim..." -- would remove the "but" here

Done. Miyagawa (talk) 23:30, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Filming took eight days, concluding on January 14, although this was due to an overlap with the following episode, "Damage"." -- I don't quite understand why this was due to an overlap; could you clarify it?

Redrafted to explain - the episodes typically took seven days to film. Miyagawa (talk) 23:30, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"The episode was directed by Allan Kroeker, who "The Xindi" earlier in the season..." -- word missing

Redrafted to remove potential repetition. Miyagawa (talk) 23:30, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"...who occurred in their recurring roles on the Xindi council." -- "occurred" seems wrong here; maybe "appeared"?

Changed as suggested. Miyagawa (talk) 23:30, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"However, she found the pacing made..." -- not sure why you have "However" here, unless the Star Wars comparison is meant to be a negative criticism?

Removed the however. Miyagawa (talk) 23:30, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Otherwise, not too many issues. Will place on hold for the usual seven days. You've done a great job improving this -- the previous state of the article was awful. Keep up the good work! Ruby 2010/2013 04:08, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review - sorry it took a couple of days to make those edits! Miyagawa (talk) 23:30, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good! Passing for GA. Ruby 2010/2013 03:46, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Azati Prime. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051205130247/http://trekweb.com:80/stories.php?aid=404756a8a1232 to http://trekweb.com/stories.php?aid=404756a8a1232

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:37, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Azati Prime. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://tv.zap2it.com/tveditorial/tve_main/1%2C1002%2C272_617%7C86707%7C1%7C%2C00.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://trekweb.com/stories.php?aid=404756a8a1232
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304062219/http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/17900/star-trek-enterprise-the-complete-3rd-season/ to http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/17900/star-trek-enterprise-the-complete-3rd-season/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160330222620/http://www.startrek.com/article/enterprise-trekking-to-blu-ray-fans-helped-pick-covers to http://www.startrek.com/article/enterprise-trekking-to-blu-ray-fans-helped-pick-covers

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:15, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]