Talk:Ayanna Kim Thomas

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Wiki Education assignment: Artificial Intelligence and Law

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 September 2023 and 12 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: CommodoreVe.

— Assignment last updated by Oabrown23 (talk) 15:36, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

This page was very well written. The flow was easy to follow.

The introductory of Ayanna Thomas was great. The tone and balance

was moderate. The organization was relavant. The cons I would note t add

an image if a free non-copyright exsist. in the section of awards and honors to add bullets

to show multiple instances. Spark Society in red link is unusable. Please add a working link.

Overall this page looks great. SydtheSloth22 SydtheSloth22 (talk) 06:40, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]