Talk:Axwell & Ingrosso

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Axwell & Ingrosso article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Electronic music Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Can't Hold Us Down

I'm no expert on what constitutes a single these days when you can buy individual tracks but doesn't this say there was both an original single and a remix? --Cavrdg (talk) 13:26, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Axwell and Ingrosso. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151226154145/http://www.sverigetopplistan.se/ to http://www.sverigetopplistan.se/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:51, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clean up

Comment - @Mn1548:, @Ss112:, @Lk95:, @Zawl:, @AAron 8967:, @ANode: and @Lazz R:, due to the complexity of the error in which the track listing for the Extended Plays was very far to the right of the left margin, I did a wholesale revert to the article, reverted to Revision as of 22:23, 28 December 2017. --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:53, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jax 0677: I don't see anything different in your revert to that particular section, and this doesn't excuse reverting all the improvements made to the article in the interim time. You can fix the way the extended plays track listing displays yourself without undoing all the other improvements made to the article, particularly by ANode. Undoing; don't revert again per WP:BRD because you've already made enough to the article for today. Wanting to fix one section does not excuse all the other reverts made to the rest of the article. Your edit doesn't even touch the track listing of the EPs at all so how you think this improves the way it displays is beyond me. Ss112 18:36, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BLP Template Removal

Hey guys! Recently, I've seen that the History section is pretty well referenced, and that every claim has a citation attached to it. Would this be the right time to take down the BLP template? aNode (discuss) 10:28, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]