Talk:Awadh

India: Uttar Pradesh / History Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Uttar Pradesh (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).

Wajid Ali Shah, Wajid Ali or Wajid Ali Khan?

The fifth nawab was Wajid Ali Shah, Wajid Ali or Wajid Ali Khan?

http://lucknow.nic.in/History.htm say - Wajid Ali
The Oudh Nights : Tales of Nawab Wazirs, Kings and Begums of Lucknow/A.P. Bhatnagar. Gurgaon, Sbubhi, 2005, 338 p., ills., ISBN 81-8290-064-6. - Says Wajid Ali Khan

IrfanAli 16:51, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

Content-wise this article is close to B. Little polishing and some citations can help. Thanks. GDibyendu (talk) 19:14, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please restore the sourced information I added to this page, a user with several IP adresses keeps removing it.

http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Awadh&oldid=497779074

MATF55 (talk) 15:35, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit protected}} template. Per the box at the top of the article:

This page is currently protected from editing until June 23, 2012 or until disputes have been resolved.
This protection is not an endorsement of the current version. ... Please discuss any changes on the talk page; you may use the {{editprotected}} template to ask an administrator to make the edit if it is supported by consensus.

Therefore, you should discuss these changes and obtain consensus before using {{editprotected}}. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:51, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 20 June 2012

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please disambiguate the [[Pratapgarh]] link in the Under the Mughals section to [[Pratapgarh, Uttar Pradesh|Pratapgarh]]. Nick Number (talk) 14:52, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Redrose64 (talk) 18:00, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Nick Number (talk) 18:22, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation

For the benefit of those who need to have audio disabled (and in the interests of accessibility), please could the pronunciation be given using IPA symbols, in addition to the audio files? Rhialto (talk) 07:06, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyright problem

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 17:17, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Awadh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050907162402/http://www.bartleby.com:80/65/fa/FaizabdInd.html to http://www.bartleby.com/65/fa/FaizabdInd.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:21, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Awadh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050907162402/http://www.bartleby.com/65/fa/FaizabdInd.html to http://www.bartleby.com/65/fa/FaizabdInd.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:01, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Census data on religion

Religion in Awadh (2011)^[1]

Hindu (80.19%)

Muslim (18.93%)

Others (0.88%)

@Fylindfotberserk: In some edits on 16 March 2022, you added citations to two pre-existing pie charts, one for religion and one for language. Someone changed the data today and I tried to check the reference and found some problems. I have restored your version, but this does not fix the problems.

The URL has changed. The current URL is C-01: Population by religious community, Uttar Pradesh - 2011. This gives you a link to a download.

But when I looked at the Excel file, it shows area names in column F, but there is no Awadh. So how does the Excel file support the data in the chart?

I assume that the same issues apply to the languages chart.-- Toddy1 (talk) 06:35, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Toddy1: The version before I took a long break in 2021 [1] didn't have any such pie charts, possibly not added because Awadh is not an administrative region and doesn't get displayed in census as is, and is likely to get miss-interpreted. The pie-chart and census data were added by an IP here. After I returned back, I reverted deleted info (vandalism) as well as did some cleanup which included fixing up the URLs (including the census ones added by the IP above). IT is possible that the data is not correct since I didn't check it. I'd like to ping @C1MM: to look into the data as well. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:02, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "C-1 Population By Religious Community - Awadh region". censusindia.gov.in. Retrieved 15 March 2022.

[Religion2011-1] "C-1 Population By Religious Community - Awadh region". censusindia.gov.in. Retrieved 15 March 2022.

[1]