Jump to content

Talk:Avraham Shapira

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

birthday

[edit]

There seems to be conflicting reports on his birthday, how should we deal with this? Jon513 09:30, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It very clear that one reference has been provided already. --Shuki 21:08, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Which also contradict the other sources in the article (dies at 94, dies at 96, I think there are also sources that say he was 93). I heard from a guy who heard from guy who heard from the family that he was 98. We don't really know when he was born, and I think that the article should reflect that in some way. Jon513 08:41, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
WP is also clear about that. see Yitzchak Kaduri. That year issue was never solved either. --Shuki 17:25, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:57, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic edit

[edit]

This "Expanded" introduced a lot of problems: meaningless references, mistakes and errors, duplications, etc. Can someone please undo it? 132.70.66.13 (talk) 13:43, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted those edits by the banned sockpuppet Techiya1925. I do not believe there was any significant content added by other editors that was removed by my revert (except for attempts by the IP to make changes to that added content). I am not sure why 2601AC47 or WiiUf were restoring the banned sockpuppet's edits, especially without providing an explanation for why they were reverting the IP editor, but they can offer that explanation here if they think it would be helpful. – notwally (talk) 22:50, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Duly noted for next time that will happen. Although I should be clear that I did revert it in part because it was marked highly problematic via Special:RecentChanges. Afterwards, the IP came to my talk, where I probably was assuming too much good faith and giving helpful advice. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 23:14, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To be more specific: The IP that talked to me was 132.71.108.188 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 23:49, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Notwally, thanks! :) 132.70.66.13 (talk) 11:39, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]