Talk:Avi Loeb

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Avi Loeb article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Israel Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Project Israel To Do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Rate the Unassessed Israel-related articles and Unknown-importance Israel-related articles.
Cleanup : Cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category and the tool's wiki page.
Collaborate : Participate in WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration.
Copyedit : Timeline of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in 2005
Deletion sorting : Participate in discussions at WikiProject Deletion sorting/Israel.
Expand : Ayala Procaccia, Diamond industry in Israel, Edna Arbel, Levin Kipnis, Rami Kleinstein, Sephardic Haredim, Zman Tel Aviv, Nachum Heiman, Public Defence (Israel), Prisoner of Zion, Trial of Benjamin Netanyahu, Day to Mark the Departure and Expulsion of Jews from the Arab Countries and Iran, Pre-Modern Aliyah
See also Articles needing translation from Hebrew Wikipedia.
Geographical coordinates : Add geographic coordinates to Israel articles missing geocoordinate data.
Infobox : Add infoboxes to Israel articles needing infoboxes.
Maintain : See Israel articles needing attention.
Map : See discussion at Module:Location map/data/Israel. Add maps to articles in Wikipedia requested maps in Israel.
NPOV : Jewish exodus from Arab and Muslim countries
Photo : Add pictures to articles in Wikipedia requested photographs in Israel.
Stubs : See Israel stubs.
Update : Basic Law proposal: Israel as the Nation-State of the Jewish People
Other :
- Translate to Hebrew : David Bar-Hayim, Guy Bavli, and Guy Oseary.

‹See TfM›

Physics: Biographies Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Biographies Taskforce.

Science Policy B‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Policy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science policy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Science PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Science PolicyScience Policy articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism C‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Encyclopedic style

Obviously he's a notable researcher. But there is no need to "sell" this message by unenclopedic language or by emphasizing points which are still in flux or of minor importance. I've removed two paragraphs:

Things named after him: Should be done only for things we have (or should have) an article about. I don't know the details, but I'm sure somebody will correct me if one (or more) of the items are of utmost importance.
H-index: There are downsides in putting this in a biography:
- It has to be updated monthly, indicating that it is more news than knowledge
- It's really only needed for the extreme cases: To demonstrate that crackpots are crackpots, never cited but by themselves, and to highlight top-cited researches (with presenting the caveats of this measure). This is already done at H-index.

Pjacobi 18:26, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great, another bigot 'editor' deleting mild comments.

Merci messieurs

Thanks to you all, original contributors to this original page : it has now been translated into FR:. Merci beaucoup. Hop ! Kikuyu3 (talk) 12:29, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Mansplaining"

I reverted [1] the removal of content by an IP editor regarding some possibly offensive "mansplaining" by Loeb during a recent conference call with Jill Tarter. After that, however, I watched the video given in the linked Forbes source, and I didn't actually find it especially offensive. Maybe that is just me, however, so I am asking: Is the whole thing overblown and, therefore, not worthy of appearing in this wikiarticle, or should the material be kept? Attic Salt (talk) 22:41, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I watched the Forbes video. Based on that, the "mansplaining" accusation seems overblown to me. sbelknap (talk) 22:43, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The term 'mansplaining' is sexist and bigoted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.144.163.142 (talk) 19:22, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Criticisms / controversy

As noted in the above section, the specific conference call with Jill Tarter probably wasn't sufficiently notable to have a section to itself. However, there probably should be mention somewhere that he is not an uncontroversial scientist. Even news articles broadly supportive of him not that his speculations attract quit a bit of criticism. Examples:

Tenorio, Rich. "Israeli scientist proves his far-out theory on interstellar meteor is down to earth". www.timesofisrael.com. Retrieved 2023-05-31.
Williams, Matthew S. (2021-03-09). "The Harvard astrophysicist who believes: Aliens are very close". interestingengineering.com. Retrieved 2023-05-31.
Magazine, Smithsonian; Gritz, Jennie Rothenberg. "The Wonder of Avi Loeb". Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 2023-05-31.
Moshakis, Alex; @alex_moshakis (2021-01-31). "Professor Avi Loeb: 'It would be arrogant to think we're alone in the universe'". The Observer. ISSN 0029-7712. Retrieved 2023-05-31.
Billings, Lee. "Astronomer Avi Loeb Says Aliens Have Visited, and He’s Not Kidding". Scientific American. Retrieved 2023-05-31.

Ouellette, Jennifer (2021-03-18). "The debate continues: 'Oumuamua could be remnant of Pluto-like planet". Ars Technica. Retrieved 2023-05-31.McNamee, Kai (2022-08-31). "An astronomer thinks alien tech could be on the ocean floor. Not everyone agrees". npr.

Similarly, there are a few more in-depth pieces from his critics:

Goodwin, Simon (2021-02-18). "Has Earth been visited by an alien spaceship? Harvard professor Avi Loeb vs everybody else". The Conversation. Retrieved 2023-05-31.
Siegel, Ethan. "The Uncensored Guide To 'Oumuamua, Aliens, And That Harvard Astronomer". Forbes. Retrieved 2023-05-31.

I think it's probably reasonable to make mention of these. Note though, that most media commentary is a little bit vague as to what aspects of his work and media appearances are being specifically criticised and sometimes mix it up with how Loeb characterises of him. We probably need to more clearly and fairly describe the reception of his activities, without being overly promotional or overly sensational. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)^talk 03:40, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Evolution and evolvability I agree...there should be a controversies section on his profile. That doesn't make him wrong and he seems to have a habit of being right, but it does let the reader contextualise the various claims. This is the difference between Wikipedia and Britannica.. a clearer process of vetting. And yes, I'm an astrophysicist. 147.10.235.15 (talk) 10:09, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Especially with his recent very aggressive claims about discovering interstellar material, I think a criticism section is warranted. Just today the New York Times ran an article including several comments from scientists who are openly exasperated with Loeb, and one who says his colleagues are refusing to engage in peer review with him due to improper behavior. I added some information from it to the relevant part of the article. StereoFolic (talk) 20:43, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The propaganda rag NYT critical of an Israeli? Whatever next ...

NYT story on Loeb

Substantial story here on Loeb. Jjhake (talk) 22:54, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done - @Jjhake: (and others) - Thank You for your comment - and suggestion re the NYT story on Loeb^[1] - edit added earlier - see => https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Avi_Loeb&diff=1172034645&oldid=1171815770 - Thanks again - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 00:14, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That’s very minimal. I don’t see any reference in this article to the draft paper co-authored with Sean M. Kirkpatrick which has been written about in other strong sources before this NYT piece. And there are likely a couple other facts relevant to this Loeb article in the NYT piece. But no rush. Jjhake (talk) 01:20, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jjhake: (and others) - Thanks again for your comments - yes - my edit addition was for starters - more could be noted of course - no problem whatsoever if anyone would like to contribute - I'm currently a bit busy with other interests, including real-world ones - iac - Thanks again - and - Stay Safe and Healthy!! - Drbogdan (talk) 01:53, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Fletcher, Seth (August 24, 2023). "How a Harvard Professor Became the World's Leading Alien Hunter - Avi Loeb's single-minded search for extraterrestrial life has made him the most famous practicing astronomer in the country — and possibly the most controversial. + comment". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 24, 2023. Retrieved August 24, 2023.

Great, the usual Israel-haters deleting comments ... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.6.182.106 (talk) 14:21, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[NYT-20230824-1] Fletcher, Seth (August 24, 2023). "How a Harvard Professor Became the World's Leading Alien Hunter - Avi Loeb's single-minded search for extraterrestrial life has made him the most famous practicing astronomer in the country — and possibly the most controversial. + comment". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 24, 2023. Retrieved August 24, 2023.

[1]