Talk:Automatix (software)

This article was nominated for deletion on June 8 2007. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Linux Low‑importance

	Linux portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled discussion

Please do not vandalize the wiki article by adding misleading information and attacks on the creator of Automatix. I have removed all this inflammatory junk. Please do not revert the changes again. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.58.69.137 (talk • contribs).

I've readded the negative comments by Matt Zimmerman. This isn't an advert - sorry. Secretlondon 20:02, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the negative comments again because they are outdated and do not apply to automatix2 (a very advanced application). The comments made by the individual developers are also without any real proof and are thus misleading. The wikipedia is not a source of spreading false/misleading information. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.58.69.137 (talk • contribs).

The comments made by Matt Zimmerman are based on the now outdated Automatix(1) and whether they are correct or not is debatable in the first place. I see this as a petty attempt to steal the thunder from the automatix developers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yokosleep (talk • contribs)

Verifiability, not truth. This is not a hagiography, and the article isn't about Automatix 2 alone. Superm401 - Talk 07:59, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

??? Anyone know why I can't access the site on my 2 computers? It's been down since at least yesterday!--Dagibit 17:56, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be still down today. Have they moved? 88.65.120.235 15:51, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Confirm. site down.

Is it free software?

Is Automatix itself free software? Can anyone give a link which says which free software licence it uses? GPL? Thanks.--Gronky 11:37, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can't even find mention of the source on their web site. Secretlondon 12:48, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Automatix Links Broken

It appears as though they shutdown the getautomatix site... and I do believe the development of this software has been done for quite some time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.161.6.85 (talk) 07:06, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Automatix (software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080401063821/http://www.getautomatix.com:80/forum/index.php?showtopic=2424 to http://www.getautomatix.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=2424

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:15, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Automatix (software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:39, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Automatix (software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071025000341/http://mjg59.livejournal.com/77440.html to http://mjg59.livejournal.com/77440.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.getautomatix.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:46, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Automatix (software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090208231028/http://forums.technalign.org/index.php?topic=311.0 to http://forums.technalign.org/index.php?topic=311.0

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:56, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]