Talk:Auto maintenance
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Since the external publication copied Wikipedia rather than the reverse, please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following sources:
|
Opening heading
[edit]Is there a "generic" or "general" car maintenance schedule? Perhaps that could be a good addition to the best article ever. Right? --67.34.188.252 (talk) 20:19, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Page moved to Auto maintenance. Vehicle maintenance is unacceptable because vehicles may be non-motorized; "auto" implies automated/motorized, which is the subject here. Born2cycle (talk) 16:59, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Better title
[edit]Car maintenance → Automobile maintenance — The title of this article, car maintenance, seems unnecessarily restictive. Wouldn't the title automotive maintenance or automobile maintenance still be acceptable, but not unnecessarily limit the article to cars? 70.247.164.231 (talk) 23:07, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
- Wikipedia currently treats the two terms as synonyms (car redirects to automobile). What do you see as the difference? Powers T 02:32, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
- As far as I know "car" is simply the British English word for American "automobile", but perhaps there is also a more restricted meaning for "car" in American? Either way I think it's a just a language difficulty and automobile maintenance would just be the same problem in reverse. However, both terms do omit many other vehicles which are within the scope of the article: vans, lorries (trucks) and so on. In that case, automotive maintenance seems a big improvement: it includes those other vehicles so describes the scope of the article better, and it avoids language difficulties as it is clearly comprehensible in UK English, and presumably also in American. Richard New Forest (talk) 09:39, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
- FYI, "car" is far more common in the U.S. than "automobile" or "auto"; the latter sound old-fashioned to American ears. Powers T 12:42, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, I didn't know that – most of my knowledge of American dialect comes from films... Richard New Forest (talk) 14:42, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
- In American usage, car is usually distinguished from truck, for example. I agree automotive maintenance is preferable to automobile maintenance. Actually, auto maintenance also sounds better than automotive maintenance, but I'm not sure that's clear enough. I disagree that "auto" sounds old-fashioned to Americans, though. It's very widely used, but probably not much in the first person. 70.250.198.35 (talk) 04:39, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
- Depends on the context. Would you really expect someone to say "She'd taken the new auto out for a test drive"? Powers T 13:01, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
- Exactly, it depends on context. "Auto maintenance" is generally understood to apply to most vehicles in the U.S., and this is the typical context in which "auto" is used, as a catch-all for various kinds of vehicles. "Car maintenance" would be understood as more limited in scope, just like motorcycle maintenance would be. The sentence you provide is a completely different context, unrelated to the issue under discussion, so I won't debate it further. 70.250.198.35 (talk) 03:28, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
- How about vehicle maintenance? (Just a thought. I have no real preference.) Station1 (talk) 01:07, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
- That would do fine. Richard New Forest (talk) 08:29, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
- How about vehicle maintenance? (Just a thought. I have no real preference.) Station1 (talk) 01:07, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
- Exactly, it depends on context. "Auto maintenance" is generally understood to apply to most vehicles in the U.S., and this is the typical context in which "auto" is used, as a catch-all for various kinds of vehicles. "Car maintenance" would be understood as more limited in scope, just like motorcycle maintenance would be. The sentence you provide is a completely different context, unrelated to the issue under discussion, so I won't debate it further. 70.250.198.35 (talk) 03:28, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
- Depends on the context. Would you really expect someone to say "She'd taken the new auto out for a test drive"? Powers T 13:01, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Repair shops
[edit]This article doesn't present a very broad view of auto maintenance. It reads more like a DIY checklist, and completely ignores the significant role of automobile repair shops. Think it needs to include this perspective to be complete and unbiased. 70.250.190.30 (talk) 01:10, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed
[edit]Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.carrepairvegas.com/optimizing-fuel-economy/ (cited by IP in insertion). Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. NortyNort (Holla) 06:30, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
Merge
[edit]The two articles service (motor vehicle) and auto maintenance are currently very short and have so much overlap that a merger seems in order. Admittedly, "service" and "maintenance" are not perfect synonyms, in that you can do your own maintenance continually, whereas a service is done intermittently by a professional. However, that is a point that can easily be made in a merged article, without needing to repeat all the other things currently listed in both articles. jnestorius(talk) 16:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Generally service means attending to simple/non critical thing like checking the oil level, refilling the window washing fluid, etc. Maintenance refers to things done to keep a functioning vehicle from malfunctioning, things like changing the oil, changing the brake linings, changing the timing belt, etc. Repairs are when you fix something that is broken. All three of these things are interrelated and overlapping.
Auto service should be about the most basic things like checking fluid levels, tire wear and belt and hose condition, maintenance should be about the concept of keeping a vehicle in good working order with the aim of making it run better and last longer. They should probably be sections of one article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.141.102.240 (talk) 16:12, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
- Support and merge Tune-up here while we're at it. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 17:41, 25 March 2016 (UTC)