Talk:Authoritarian capitalism

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Authoritarian capitalism article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Capitalism (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Capitalism, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CapitalismWikipedia:WikiProject CapitalismTemplate:WikiProject CapitalismCapitalism articles

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Four Asian Tigers#Singapore|Singapore's economics success]] Anchor Four Asian Tigers#Singapore links to a specific web page: Economy of Singapore. The anchor (Singapore) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

More countries

More countries should be included in examples Mynamz (talk) 03:19, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some very bad inaccuracies in this article

So this part in particular: "Countries commonly referred to as being authoritarian capitalist states include China since the economic reforms, Hungary under Viktor Orbán, Russia under Vladimir Putin, Chile under Augusto Pinochet, Singapore under Lee Kuan Yew and Turkey under Recep Tayyip Erdoğan as well as fascist regimes and military dictatorships during the Cold War. Nazi Germany has also been described as authoritarian capitalist,[4][5][6] especially for its privatization policy in the 1930s."

Out of all those examples, only Chile and Singapore actually fit the definition of authoritarian capitalism. According to https://www.heritage.org/index/ranking which measures economic freedom, Singapore is #1, Chile is #19, while Russia is #92, China is #107 Hungary is # 55 and Turkey is #76, is Nazi Germany considered capitalist because they removed some industries from complete State control to give them to individuals very closely linked to the State? Could you really consider those countries capitalist while they rank so low on the business freedom index? Those examples are just blatantly wrong It seems the person managing this particular page doesn't really understand what capitalism is — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2804:7f3:683:83f7:61a7:bc37:575a:ea4e (talk) 19:22, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you're trying to imply here, but Nazi Germany was definitely capitalist. They actively persecuted socialists and communists, and they were very publicly and obviously committed to private property. I agree that this article has some issues, but let's refrain from falling into the "Nazis were socialists" trap. Cheers. DeVosMax [ contribs • talk • created media ] 10:28, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Persecuting communists equals capitalism? That's a whole take dude. Alejandro Basombrio (talk) 16:34, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

canada would also fall into this category, at #15. 107.179.229.114 (talk) 16:20, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Biased sources

There are a lot of citations from sources like the heritage foundation or the fraser institute. These aren’t academic. They’re think tanks meant to drum up support for the status quo. 2604:3D08:948E:AA00:75BD:72A1:9138:DAD3 (talk) 15:04, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]