Talk:Austrobaileya

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Queensland / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Austrobaileya is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

austrobaileya is an outgroup in the magnoliophyta... not part of magnoliopsida. the whole wikipedia plant phylogeny scheme could use a nice little modernization a la the tree of life web project.

Additional references to get and check

Ross, E.M. (1989). Plant profile. Austrobaileya 3:163-165.

Now obtained. A salient quotation:

Notes: Although Telford (1983) mentions two species, viz A. scandens and A. maculata, other authorities (e.g. Endress 1980) consider there to be only one in the genus. Collections at BRI show the key characters listed by White (1948) for separating his two species are unreliable. The leaf shape varies from lanceolate to oblong on the one branchlet; flowers on both type specimens have densely papillose stamens and staminodes; and as Endress (1980) pointed out, the shape of each stamen's apex depends on its position within the spiral. On the basis of this evidence, the taxa previously included under A. scandens and A. maculata are thus regarded as conspecific, and A. scandens, being the older name, should be used for the species concerned.
Endress, P. K. (1980) The reproductive structures and systematic position of the Austrobaileyaceae. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematic, Planzengeschichte und Planzengeographie, 101: 393-433.

Telford, I. (1983) Austrobaileyaceae. In Morley, B. D. & Toelken, H. R. (eds) Flowering Plants in Australia. Adelaide: Rigby.

White, C.T., (1948) A new species of Austrobaileya (Austrobaileyaceae) from Australia. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 29(3): 255 (quotation of APNI: [tax. nov.]

Type: "QUEENSLAND: Cook District: Mt. Spurgeon, alt. ca. 4000 ft., rainforest, C.T. White 10734 (fls.) Sept. 1936 ... TYPE in Herb. Brisbane." )

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Austrobaileya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:40, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]