Talk:Austrian school of economics

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Austrian school of economics article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12: 30 days

Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.

Economics High‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Libertarianism Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Libertarianism portal This article is supported by WikiProject Libertarianism (assessed as Mid-importance).

Austria Mid‑importance

	Austria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Conservatism Mid‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:

Leonard, Andrew (19 February 2013). "How Paul Krugman broke a Wikipedia page on economics: An 'edit war' breaks out over the Nobel Prize-winner's critique of ultra-conservative Austrian economics". Salon Magazine.
Krugman, Paul (20 February 2013). "Fine Austrian Whines". The New York Times.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Scientific theory#Pedagogical definition|theories]] The anchor (#Pedagogical definition) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

The more the Murrayer?

As the article stands, it seems no section cannot end without a sentence or paragraph of "what would Rothbard say?" This places undue weight on his views and gives them undue emphasis relative to the other Austrian views and scholars on these subjects. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SPECIFICO (talk • contribs) 16:18, June 6, 2013

Removed reference of Church-Turing computability as indicator of human actions

The text read "Mainstream economists have argued that Austrians are often averse to the use of mathematics and statistics in economics. However, independent scholar Martin Sibileau, in 2014, offered a formal proof that, based on the Church-Turing thesis, human action is not "decidable", "computable" and therefore cannot be mathematized. He also suggested a logics-based approach for a definitive formalization of the Austrian thought."

Whether human action is decidable or computable has nothing to do with whether statistics can be applied. As shown by the indeterminacy in quantum state measurements, whether something *can* be known or computed has nothing to do whether it can be statistically modeled.

Changed 'Prussian Historical School' to 'Historical School'

Per this old discussion:

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Austrian_School/Archive_12#Prussian_Historical_School?

Austrians regard ‘neoliberal’ as a slur

Austrians do not think of themselves as being “neoliberal” and view the term as an offensive epithet. Slapping that baggage-laden tag on this article violates neutral point of view.

Removing the "too technical" template

After reading through the article it doesn't seem technical at all to me, particularly compared to the rest of economics Wikipedia. Is there a consensus that this template can be removed? 0xchase (talk) 13:27, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree and the tag was 14 years old. I took it out. North8000 (talk) 14:20, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks 0xchase (talk) 14:26, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Intentionally Obtuse

This article reads as though it were intentionally obtuse to hide the practical effects of this school of economics on average working people and the poor,i.e. austerity, great wealth inequality etc. Why is there no inclusion of criticism? 2600:8801:BE21:3200:45FB:31D3:E4D2:C015 (talk) 09:36, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]